Who is associated with the dynamic systems view of how people develop their motor skills?

Abstract

Dynamic systems theory (DST) outlines three constraints (i.e. individual, task, and environment) that influence the emergence of behavior. These constraints interact with one another to self-organize and create a spontaneous behavior. For many researchers studying motor development, this spontaneous behavior refers to the production of motor movement. DST provides an explanation for the variability and spontaneous movement that occurs from individual to individual. While this theory is accepted as one of the major explanations of motor development, it is unknown how it is being utilized to inform the research on motor development or the development of interventions. In this review, the author found 18 instances in the literature where DST had been used to analyze, test, or manipulate motor patterns and movement. Overall, the studies report a positive effect from the manipulation of constraints with respect to a change in motor pattern. Only one study was found that sought to positively improve behavior through the directed use of constraints; the majority of studies sought to understand the influence constraints have on the production of movement.

References

1. Kamm K, Thelen E, Jensen JL. Dynamical systems approach motor development. Phys Ther 1990;70:763–75.10.1093/ptj/70.12.763Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Gabbard CP. Lifelong motor development, 5th ed. New York: Pearson, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

3. Payne VG, Isaacs LD. Human motor development, 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

4. Darwin CR. A biographical sketch of an infant. Mind 1877;2:285–94.10.1093/mind/os-2.7.285Search in Google Scholar

5. Shinn MW. The biography of a baby. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1900.Search in Google Scholar

6. Roberton MA. Motor development: recognizing our roots, charting our future. Quest 1989;41:213–23.10.1080/00336297.1989.10483971Search in Google Scholar

7. Thelen, E. Motor development. Am Psychol 1995;50:79–95.10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.79Search in Google Scholar

8. Gabbard C, Krebs R. Studying environmental influence on motor development in children. Phys Ed 2012;69:136–49.Search in Google Scholar

9. Clark JE, Whitall J. What is motor development? The lessons of history. Quest 1989;41:183–202.10.1080/00336297.1989.10483969Search in Google Scholar

10. Stelmach GE. Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1978.Search in Google Scholar

11. Thelen E, Ulrich BD. Hidden skills. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1999:56:6–15.Search in Google Scholar

12. Lewis MD. The promise of dynamic systems approach for an integrated account of human development. Child Dev 2000;71:36–43.10.1111/1467-8624.00116Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Clark JE, Phillips SJ. A longitudinal study of intralimb coordination in the first year of independent walking. Child Dev 1993;64:1143–57.10.2307/1131331Search in Google Scholar

14. Newell KM. Constraints of the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting H, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986:341–60.10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19Search in Google Scholar

15. Newell KM, Jordan K. Task constraints and movement organization: a common language. In: Davis WE, Broadhead GD, editors. Ecological task analysis and movement. Human Kinetics, 2007:5–13.Search in Google Scholar

16. Haywood KM, Getchell N. Life span motor development, 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

17. Langley DJ. The influence of functional constraints on sport-skill learning in a senior adult. J Aging Phys Act 2001:9;269–84.10.1123/japa.9.3.269Search in Google Scholar

18. Hutzler Y. A systematic ecological model for adapting physical activities: theoretical foundations and practical examples. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2007:24;287–304.10.1123/apaq.24.4.287Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Gagen LM, Getchell N. Using “constraints” to design developmentally appropriate movement activities for early childhood education. Early Child Educ J 2006;34:227–32.10.1007/s10643-006-0135-6Search in Google Scholar

20. Renshaw I, Chow JY, Davids K, Hammond J. A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Phys Educ Sport Peda 2010;15:117–37.10.1080/17408980902791586Search in Google Scholar

21. Hadders-Algra M. Variation and variability. Phys Ther 2010;90:1823–37.10.2522/ptj.20100006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Berstein NA. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

23. Turvey MT. Coordination. Am Psychol 1990;45:938–53.10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.938Search in Google Scholar

24. Davids K, Glazier P, Araújo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamic systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sport medicine. Sport Med 2003;33:245–60.10.2165/00007256-200333040-00001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Šerbetar I. The role of dynamic systems in motor development research. Ann Kinesiol 2014;5:113–21.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ulrich BD. Opportunities for early intervention, based on theory, basic neuroscience and clinical science. Phys Ther 2010;90:1868–80.10.2522/ptj.20100040Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Wicke J, Jensen R. A pilot study of a dynamical systems approach to examining changes in static balance of adolescents. Percept Mot Skills 2002;95:267–78.10.2466/pms.2002.95.1.267Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Gagen L, Getchell N. Combining theory and practice in the gymnasium “constraints” within an ecological perspective. J Phys Educ Recr Dance 2004;75:25–30.10.1080/07303084.2004.10607236Search in Google Scholar

29. Liu T, Hamilton M, Davis L, ElGarhy S. Gross motor performance by children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children on TGMD-2. J Child Adol Behav 2014;2:1–4.10.4172/2375-4494.1000123Search in Google Scholar

30. Pan CY, Tsai CL, Chu CH. Fundamental movement skills in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2009;39:1694–705.10.1007/s10803-009-0813-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Staples KL, Reid G. Fundamental movement skills and autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2010;40:209–17.10.1007/s10803-009-0854-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Liu T. Motor milestone development in young children with autism spectrum disorders: an exploratory study. Educ Psychol Pract 2012;28:315–26.10.1080/02667363.2012.684340Search in Google Scholar

33. Lloyd M, MacDonald M, Lord C. Motor skills of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 2013;17:133–46.10.1177/1362361311402230Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Ozonoff S, Young GS, Goldring S, Greiss-Hess L, Herrera AM, Steele J, et al. Gross motor development, movement abnormalities, and early identification of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2008;38:644–56.10.1007/s10803-007-0430-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Staples KL, MacDonald M, Zimmer C. Assessment of motor behavior among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Int Rev Res Dev Disabil 2012;42:179–214.10.1016/B978-0-12-394284-5.00007-3Search in Google Scholar

36. Fournier KA, Hass CJ, Naik SK, Lodha N, Cauraugh JH. Motor coordination in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2010;40:1227–40.10.1007/s10803-010-0981-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Dewey D, Cantell M, Crawford SG. Motor and gestural performance in children with autism spectrum disorders, developmental coordination disorder, and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007;13:246–56.10.1017/S1355617707070270Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Wong C, Odom SL, Hume K, Cox AW, Fettig A, Kucharczyk S, et al. Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

39. American Psychological Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Author, 2013.10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596Search in Google Scholar

40. Colombo-Dougovito AM. Successful evidence-based practices for autism spectrum disorder and their use for the development of motor skills in physical education. Palaestra 2015;29:34–41.Search in Google Scholar

41. Healy S. Adapting equipment. Palaestra 2014;27:37–42.Search in Google Scholar

42. Breslin CM, Rudisill ME. The effect of visual supports on performance of the TGMD-2 for children with autism spectrum disorder. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2011;28:342–53.10.1123/apaq.28.4.342Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Breslin CM, Rudisill ME. Relationships among assessment time, time on task, and motor skill performance in children with autism spectrum disorder. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2013;30:338–50.10.1123/apaq.30.4.338Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Stodden DF, Gao Z, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ. Dynamic relationships between motor skill competence and health-related fitness in youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2014;26:231–41.10.1123/pes.2013-0027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. MacDonald M, Jaszewski C, Esposito P, Ulrich D. The effect of learning to ride a two-wheel bicycle on the social development of children with autism spectrum disorder. Palaestra 2011;25:37–42.Search in Google Scholar

46. Bedford R, Pickles A, Lord C. Early gross motor skills predict the subsequent language development of language in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 2015;13:15–24.10.1002/aur.1587Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Abney DH, Warlaumont AS, Haussman A, Ross JM, Wallot S. Using nonlinear methods to quantify changes in infant limb movements and vocalizations. Front Psychol 2014;5:1–16.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00771Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Astill S. Can children with developmental coordination disorder adapt to task constraints when catching two-handed? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:57–67.10.1080/09638280600947856Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Bennett S, Button C, Kingsbury D, Davids K. Manipulating visual informational constraints during practice enhances the acquisition of catching skill in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999;70:220–32.10.1080/02701367.1999.10608042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Clemente F, Couceiro M, Martins F, Dias G, Mendes R. Influence of task constraints on attacker trajectories during 1V1 sub-phases in soccer practice. Sportlogia 2012;8:13–20.10.5550/sgia.120801.en.013CSearch in Google Scholar

51. Farrow D, Reid M. The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. J Sports Sci 2010;28:723–32.10.1080/02640411003770238Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Langendorfer S. Motor-task goal as a constraint on developmental status. In: Clark JE, Humphery JH, editors. Advances in motor development research, 3rd ed. New York, NY: AMS Press, Inc., 1990:16–28.Search in Google Scholar

53. Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA. Individual pathways in the development of forceful throwing. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002;73:245–56.10.1080/02701367.2002.10609018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Liu Y-T, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM. Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2006;32:380–93.10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.380Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Maida SO, Mccune L. A dynamic systems approach to the development of crawling by blind and sighted infants. Review 1996;28:119–36.Search in Google Scholar

56. Ohgi S, Loo KK, Morita S, Mizuike C. A dynamical systems analysis of spontaneous movements in newborn infants. J Mot Behav 2007;39:203–14.10.3200/JMBR.39.3.203-214Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Stergiou N, Jensen JL, Bates BT, Scholten SD, Tzetzis G. A dynamical systems investigation of lower extremity coordination during running over obstacles. Clin Biomech 2001;16:213–21.10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00090-5Search in Google Scholar

58. Sweeting T, Rink JE. Effects of direct instruction and environmentally designed instruction on the process and product characteristics of a fundamental skill. J Teach Phys Educ 1999;18:216–33.10.1123/jtpe.18.2.216Search in Google Scholar

59. Ulrich BD, Ulrich DA, Angulo-Kinzler RM. The impact of context manipulations on movement patterns during a transition period. Hum Mov Sci 1998;46:327–46.10.1016/S0167-9457(98)00003-7Search in Google Scholar

60. Ulrich BD, Ulrich DA, Collier DH, Cole EL. Developmental shifts in the ability of infants with down syndrome to produce treadmill steps. Phys Ther 1995;75:14–23.10.1093/ptj/75.1.14Search in Google Scholar

61. Vernadakis N, Papastergiou M, Zetou E, Antoniou P. The impact of an exergame-based intervention on children’s fundamental motor skills. Comput Educ 2015;83:90–102.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.001Search in Google Scholar

62. Volman M, Wijnroks A, Vermeer A. Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:684–92.10.1191/0269215502cr540oaSearch in Google Scholar

63. Wu C-Y, Lin K-C, Lin K-H, Chang C-W, Chen C-L. Effects of task constraints on reaching kinematics by healthy adults. Percep Mot Skills 2005;100:983–94.10.2466/pms.100.3c.983-994Search in Google Scholar

64. Balan CM, Davis WE. Ecological task analysis. J Phys Educ Recr Dance 1993;64:54–61.10.1080/07303084.1993.10607352Search in Google Scholar

65. Burton AW, Davis WE. Ecological task analysis. Hum Movement Series 1996:15;285–314.10.1016/0167-9457(95)00047-XSearch in Google Scholar

66. Herkowitz J. Developmental task analysis: the design of movement experiences and evaluation of motor development status. In: Ridenour M, editor. Motor development issues and applications. Princeton, New York: Princeton Book Co, 1978:139–64.Search in Google Scholar

67. Gesell A. Maturation and infant behavior pattern. Psychol Rev 1929;36:307–19.10.1037/h0075379Search in Google Scholar

68. McGraw MB. The neuromuscular maturation of the human infant. New York: Columbia University Press, 1943.Search in Google Scholar

69. Clark JE. On becoming skillful: patterns and constraints. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995;66:173–83.10.1080/02701367.1995.10608831Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Clark JE, Metcalfe SS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clark JE, Humphrey JH, editors. Motor development: research and reviews, 2nd ed. Reston, VA: National Association of Sport and Physical Education, 2002:163–90.Search in Google Scholar

71. Brymer E, Renshaw I. An introduction to the constraints-led approach to learning in outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education 2010;14:33–41.10.1007/BF03400903Search in Google Scholar

72. Coker CA. Intervention strategies for performance enhancement. Phys Health Educ 2014;79:14–7.Search in Google Scholar

73. Clark JE. Development of voluntary motor skill. In: Meisami E, Timiras PS, editors. Handbook of human growth and development biology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1999:237–50.Search in Google Scholar

74. Thelen E. The (re)discovery of motor development. Dev Psychol 1989;25:946–49.10.1037/0012-1649.25.6.946Search in Google Scholar

75. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

76. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 1975;82:225–60.10.1037/h0076770Search in Google Scholar

77. Kugler PN, Kelso JA, Turvey MT. On the concept of coordinative structure as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. In: Stelmach GE, editor. Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

78. Sabari JS, Kane L, Flanagan SR, Stineberg A. Constraint-induced motor relearning after stroke: a naturalistic case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:524–28.10.1053/apmr.2001.21857Search in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Pope M, Liu T, Breslin CM, Getchell N. Using constraints to design developmentally appropriate movement activities for children with autism spectrum disorders. J Phys Educ Recr Dance 2012;83:35–41.10.1080/07303084.2012.10598726Search in Google Scholar

80. Seifert L, Komar J, Barbosa T, Toussaint H, Millet G, Davids K. Coordination pattern variability provides functional adaptations to constraints in swimming performance. Sport Med 2014;44:1333–45.10.1007/s40279-014-0210-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Spoelman M, Verspoor M. Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity. Appl Linguist 2010;31:532–53.10.1093/applin/amq001Search in Google Scholar

82. MacDonald M, Esposito P, Ulrich D. The physical activity patterns of children with autism. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:422.10.1186/1756-0500-4-422Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2016-2-24

Accepted: 2016-6-29

Published Online: 2016-8-10

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Who created the dynamic systems theory?

What is the dynamic systems view of motor development?

What is Esther Thelen theory?

What is dynamic systems theory OT?