Which type of survey question requires coding to help discover themes from responses?

Which type of survey question requires coding to help discover themes from responses?

Which type of survey question requires coding to help discover themes from responses?
Open-ended survey questions are often used in surveys to provide respondents with the opportunity to freely express their opinion about issues.  Open-ended questions can also provide a greater depth of insight that a closed-ended question may not have.  But, open-ended questions have some drawbacks:

  1. Respondents don’t always like them much (it takes work on their part), often resulting in brief, unsatisfactory answers.
  2. They lengthen the time to complete a survey which may lower your response rate, and
  3. If there are many open-ended answers, it is tedious to read through all of the verbatim comments to identify any insights

Problems One and Two can be overcome by good question wording and survey formatting.  One solution to Problem Three is to code the responses into categories to aid in the analysis. However, coding those responses is one of the most tedious and frustrating tasks marketing researchers face.  This leads us to the topic of today’s blog.

Coding categorizes open-ended responses into groups that can then be used in analysis. The coding process is open to the judgment and interpretation of the coder, so it is something that must be done diligently and with a standard process. While there is software that can be used to help you code open-ended responses, there is no substitute for human intelligence and judgement to make sure the codes are appropriate.

Here’s a process to help you code open-ended responses:

  1. What kind of question are you dealing with? Are the responses truly from an open-ended question or are they responses to an “other, please specify” question? In the latter case, you are looking for answers that could be coded back into existing categories as well as additional categories that should be added. If they are true open-ended questions with no existing responses, you’re starting from scratch. In either case, the process is generally the same.
  2. Next, reading through the responses will help you get a feel for potential response categories. Depending on how many respondents you have, how many answered the question, and how long the verbatim responses are, you may choose to read only a sample of the responses. Try to read at least 10%. If you are only reading a sample, select randomly through the data set so that you don’t get a bias with early responses vs. later responses.
  3. Identify potential response categories. At this point, you may have “too many” categories that you will need to combine or narrow down later.
  4. Go back to the open-ended responses and try coding them. Once you have them all coded, try to combine similar responses. Try not to have more than 10 categories, with no individual category receiving less than 5% of responses.
  5. Cover all responses. Even if you have an “other” category, every response must go somewhere.
  6. Create codes that anyone reading the report will understand. One or two-word code descriptions really don’t provide any value or additional insight to research.
  7. If a comment includes multiple topics, code it into multiple categories. For example, “Orange juice is delicious and nutritious” would be coded into both the “Delicious” and the “Nutritious” categories.
  8. Sometimes separating the codes into positive, neutral and negative groups can add valuable information in analysis.
  9. Repeat as necessary.

Open-ended question responses can be revealing and you may want to consider preparing a verbatim reports (simply a word document with all of the verbatim responses laid out by question.) Additionally, pulling out illustrative verbatim responses in the report can highlight key findings and bring your research report to life. Click here on how to write a research report that gets read!

Journal Information

Sociological Methodology (SM) is the only American Sociological Association periodical publication devoted entirely to research methods. It is a compendium of new and sometimes controversial advances in social science methodology. Contributions come from diverse areas and have something new and useful--and sometimes surprising--to say about a wide range of methodological topics. SM seeks qualitative and quantitative contributions that address the full range of methodological problems confronted by empirical research in the social sciences, including conceptualization, data analysis, data collection, measurement, modeling, and research design. The journal provides a forum for engaging the philosophical issues that underpin sociological research. Papers published in SM are original methodological contributions, including new methodological developments, reviews or illustrations of recent developments that provide new methodological insights, and critical evaluative discussions of research practices and traditions. SM encourages the inclusion of applications to real-world sociological data. SM is published annually as an edited, hardbound book.

Publisher Information

Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Sociological Methodology © 1971 Wiley
Request Permissions

What are the 4 types of survey questions?

4 Classes of Survey Questions.
Open-Ended. If you could individually interview each survey respondent, you'd probably ask a lot of open-ended questions. ... .
Closed-Ended (Static) ... .
Closed-Ended (Dynamic) ... .
Task/Activity Based..

What is coding type questionnaire?

Questionnaire Coding This means that a number is assigned in advance to each possible answer . Coding will enable a quicker and easier data entry. The ideal code numbers depend on the software which will be used for data analysis.

Can open

Open-ended survey questions often provide the most useful insights, but if you are dealing with hundreds or thousands of answers, summarising them will give you the biggest headache. The answer lies in coding open-ended questions. This means assigning one or more categories (also called codes) to each response.

What are the three types of survey questions?

Here are the types of survey questions you should be using to get more survey responses: Open-ended questions. Closed-ended questions. Rating questions.