What are Monroes feelings about the American continents and colonization by European powers?

The Monroe Doctrine was first introduced in 1823 by President James Monroe in his annual message to Congress. The Doctrine became the United States’ primary foreign policy document, declaring the Western Hemisphere closed from European colonization or intervention. Any breach of the Monroe Doctrine would be a threat to the United States. The Monroe Doctrine deeply effected the United States’ foreign policy relationship with Latin American countries. In Latin American countries such as Spain, it had a positive effect because the U.S. demanded Spain to leave the U.S. alone based on the isolationist position. However, it caused a negative effect on Spain because America would no longer be helping or aiding them with troops during wars with other countries. Paradoxically, the Monroe docrtine also justified the expansionist ideas that the United States had at the time, as well as the conflicts over land that were often a result of these ideas. Although the Monroe Doctrine was created to protect Latin America from Europe, it also served America’s best interests. The Monroe doctrine was in a sense a doctrine reastablishing American independence, but also including Latin American countries interests. The way in which the United States chose to intervene in Latin America, especially in Cuba, Mexico, Gran Colombia, and the Falkland Islands, was greatly influenced by the benefits and interests of the nation at the time. It is meant that the reason the United States chose to intervene in these countries were so that the United States could recieve other entities in return. The entities being protected and fulfiled through the interests of the Monroe Doctrine were land, economic prosperity, and the ideologies of the United States.

Portrait of President James Monroe

Introduction to the Monroe Doctrine

The Monroe Doctrine and Latin America

• Introduction to the Monroe Doctrine
• Monroe Doctrine's affect on Land/Territory
• The Monroe Doctrine's affect on Economics
• The United States' Ideologies and Views about Latin America
• In Conclusion
• Artifacts
• Bibliography

The Monroe Doctrine was first announced on this day in 1823.  While most Americans have heard of this most famous of foreign policy doctrines, few know that it was born as a bluff based on shrewd diplomatic analysis.

The context for the Monroe Doctrine was the collapse of Spanish rule in Latin America during the Napoleonic wars.  With Napoleon dispatched at the Battle of Waterloo and “normalcy” returning to continental politics by the early 1820s, fears arose that Spain might try to reclaim its colonies. That prospect especially worried Great Britain. British merchants had taken advantage of the collapse of Spanish rule to gain greater access to Latin America’s markets.  Eager to protect their commercial interests, British officials proposed to President James Monroe in 1823 that the two countries jointly warn European powers against any effort to reestablish colonial rule in Latin America.

Monroe initially decided to accept the British offer, in good part because his two political mentors, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, urged him to do so.  They knew that the United States was too weak to prevent Latin America’s recolonization, and they calculated that an informal alliance with Britain would benefit U.S. security—no European power would dare challenge the British navy.  But when Monroe told his cabinet of his decision, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams objected vigorously.   He believed that the United States should act unilaterally, even if it couldn’t back up its words with deeds.

The Water's Edge

James M. Lindsay analyzes the politics shaping U.S. foreign policy and the sustainability of American power. 2-4 times weekly.

Daily News Brief

A summary of global news developments with CFR analysis delivered to your inbox each morning. Most weekdays.

The World This Week

A weekly digest of the latest from CFR on the biggest foreign policy stories of the week, featuring briefs, opinions, and explainers. Every Friday.

Think Global Health

A curation of original analyses, data visualizations, and commentaries, examining the debates and efforts to improve health worldwide. Weekly.

By entering your email and clicking subscribe, you're agreeing to receive announcements from CFR about our products and services, as well as invitations to CFR events. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Adams’s conclusion reflected three hard-nosed geopolitical calculations.  First, the talk about European intervention in Latin America was just that, talk.  Because European intervention was unlikely, any American action would be symbolic only.  Second, if anyone called the administration’s bluff, Britain would come to America’s aid.  The British had too much at stake in Latin America to let Spain or any other European power reestablish colonial rule.  Third, a joint declaration would not help the United States. Britain would get all the credit because it was the great power.  As Adams put it, the United States would be better off acting alone than “to come in as a cockboat in the wake of the British man-of-war.”

Adams’s arguments won the day.  On December 2, 1823, Monroe sent a message to Congress laying down three principles for U.S. foreign policy.  First, while the United States would not interfere with existing European colonies in the Western Hemisphere, it considered the hemisphere closed to further colonization.  Second, the United States would regard any European effort to reimpose colonial rule as a hostile act toward the United States.  Third, the United States would continue to adhere to its traditional policy of not involving itself in the domestic affairs of Europe.

European leaders reacted in fury at the audacity of the Americans.  (Some things never change.)  Austria dismissed Monroe’s message as “an indecent declaration.”  Russia said it “merits only the most profound contempt.”  But in the end, Adams was right.  No European power intervened in Latin America.  This of course had everything to do with politics in Europe and nothing to do with Washington’s pronouncements.  But the Americans could still claim victory.

Although the Monroe Doctrine stands today as one of the cardinal statements of U.S. foreign policy, few people saw it that way at the time. No one called it a “doctrine” until 1852, and no president invoked it to deter European activity in Latin America until Grover Cleveland did so in 1895.  Indeed, the Monroe Doctrine’s real impact would only come when President Teddy Roosevelt redefined it.  More on that next week.

What are Monroe's feelings about the American continents and colonization by European powers?

What message does Monroe deliver to Europe about the Americans?

How does Monroe view European intervention in the Americas?

What impact if any did the Monroe Doctrine have on the European nations and their colonies in Latin America?