What is the basic difference between absorption costing and marginal variable costing?

Knowledge about the difference between absorption costing and variable costing is a must to do the product costing. Actually, success of a manufacturing business mainly depends on the way that the products are cost. There are different types of costs involved in a manufacturing environment. Particularly, the costs can be identified as variable costs and fixed costs. Absorption costing and variable costing are two different costing approaches used by manufacturing organizations. This difference occurs as absorption costing treats all variable and fixed manufacturing costs as product cost while variable costing treats only the costs that vary with the output as product cost. An organization cannot practice both the approaches at the same time while the two methods, absorption costing and variable costing, carry their own advantages and disadvantages.

What is Absorption Costing?

Absorption costing, which is also known as full costing or traditional costing, captures both fixed and variable manufacturing costs into the unit cost of a particular product. Therefore, the cost of a product under absorption costing consists of direct material, direct labour, variable manufacturing overhead, and a portion of a fixed manufacturing overhead absorbed using an appropriate base.

Since absorption costing takes all the potential costs into accounts in the calculation of per unit cost, some people believe that it is the most effective method to calculate the unit cost. This approach is simple. Moreover, under this method the inventory carries a certain amount of fixed expenses, so by showing a highly valued closing inventory, the profits for the period will also be improved. However, this can be used as an accounting trick to show the higher profits for a particular period by moving fixed manufacturing overhead from the income statement to the balance sheet as closing stocks.

What is Variable Costing?

Variable costing, which is also known as direct costing or marginal costing considers only the direct costs as the product cost. Thus, the cost of a product consists of direct material, direct labour and the variable manufacturing overhead. Fixed manufacturing overhead is considered as a periodic cost similar to the administrative and selling costs and charged against the periodic income.

Variable costing generates a clear picture on how the cost of a product changes in an incremental manner with the change in level of output of a manufacturer. However, since this method does not consider the overall manufacturing costs in costing its products, it understates the overall cost of the manufacturer.

The similarity between Absorption Costing and Variable Costing is that the purpose of both approaches are the same; to value the cost of a product.

What is the difference between Absorption Costing and Variable Costing?

• Absorption Costing charges all the manufacturing costs into the cost of a product. Variable costing charges only direct costs (material, labour and variable overhead costs) into the cost of a product.

• Product cost in absorption costing is higher than the cost calculated under variable costing. In variable costing, cost of the product is lower than the cost calculated under absorption costing.

• Value of closing stocks (in the income statement and balance sheet) is higher under absorption costing method. In variable costing, value of closing stocks is lower compared to absorption costing.

• In the absorption costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is considered as a unit cost and charged against the selling price. In variable costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is considered as a periodic cost and charged from the periodic gross profits.

Summary:

Absorption Costing vs Variable Costing

Absorption Costing and Variable Costing are two main approaches used by manufacturing organizations to arrive at cost per unit for various decision making purposes. Absorption costing considers that all the manufacturing costs should be included in per unit cost of a product; thus other than direct costs it adds a portion of fixed manufacturing cost to calculate product cost. In contrast, variable costing considers mere direct (variable) costs as product cost. Therefore, two approaches provide two product cost figures. Having understood their own advantages and disadvantages, both methods can be used as effective pricing approaches by the manufacturers.

Absorption and marginal costing are two distinct approaches used for stock valuation. When using marginal costing, the organisation's cost is the only consideration applied to the shop. Whereas in absorption costing, the organisation's fixed costs and variable expenses are applied to the stock.

The variable costs brought on by the items are referred to as item costs, whereas the reasonable expenses the element causes over a given period are regarded as period costs. With marginal costing, item costs and period costs are separated. As a result, fixed costs are not included in the item cost due to marginal costing, even though they are committed to appearing at the working benefit. 

At the same time, variable expenditures are added to the payment of items. As the name implies, absorption costing charges reasonable expenses in addition to the item cost. 

Did you you know?

According to CIMA, London's definition, "Cost Accounting is the most prevalent means of portraying cost from the location where consumption is caused to the basis of its undeniable link with cost focuses and cost units."

What Steps are Taken in Cost Accounting?

Also Read: 3 Golden Rules of Accounting - Golden Rules of Accounts Explained with Examples

The costing processes operate under autonomous administrative control. The numerous types include

  • Marginal Costing:

The administration may decide how many units to provide using this approach. Assuming a toy factory is producing 100 "Moving Monkey" toys, this technique will help management understand whether increasing production to 150 will be profitable or not. This approach takes into account the variable costs associated with the extra units that are produced. Since fixed expenses don't vary due to ongoing changes, they are not considered.

  • Standard Costing: 

In this costing method, the incurred costs are compared to the expected cost of the sound, cycle, or project. To make the modifications economically feasible, they are investigated.

  • Direct Costing: 

A given item or cycle is charged with all immediate costs incurred throughout the straightforward costing process, and all indirect costs are reduced to profit and loss.

  • Absorption Costing: 

Full costing is a method that uses absorption costing. In this, all costs are billed to the thing, activity, or project.

Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing Worked Examples

The two potential methodologies for stock valuation are marginal costing and absorption costing. Only factor expenses are charged to activity, even though actual expenditures are prohibited and assigned to the benefit.

Absorption costing is a technique of computing costs in which all fixed and variable costs are absorbed by the entire unit produced. It is mainly used for disclosing, such as in financial and charge disclosure. Some believe absorption costing is preferable to minimum costing, but others disagree. One must understand the differences between minimum and absorption costing to resolve this.

Meaning of Marginal Costing 

Marginal costing is a costing method concerned with cost changes caused by changes in volume or range of total output and sales. Variable-costing, sometimes referred to as marginal costing, is an approach that enables choices to be made on the estimation of total cost or the assurance of fixed and variable expenditures to select the best cycle and product for research, development, manufacturing, etc. 

A marginal cost is a significant increase or reduction in total costs due to a rise or decrease in the amount of production and sales. Thus, marginal costs are future costs that can be calculated by removing the total at one level of output or sale from the total at another.

Also Read: What Is Dual Aspect Concept in Accounting?

Some Important Definitions:

D. Joseph: "Marginal costing is a technique of determining the amount of change in the aggregate cost due to an increase of one unit over the existing level of production."

Harold J. Wheldon: "Other things being equal, the fixed overhead will, in total, remain fixed during changes in production achieved and the rate per unit will consequently vary whereas that variable overhead will remain constant per unit of production and vary in total."

Advantages of Marginal Costing

  • Simple to Use:

Since it avoids the challenges of apportionment of fixed costs, which is truly arbitrary, marginal costing is simple to use.

  • There is No Risk of Overcharging for Overheads:

The danger of over- as well as under overheads is reduced using this cost-cutting technique.

  • Understanding of Cost Classification:

Fixed costs are generally uncontrollable, whereas variable costs are always controllable.

The cost data required for decision-making as well as profit planning is easily accessible to management.

Disadvantages of Marginal Costing 

  • According to accounting norms, the close is not valued.
  • Fixed manufacturing expenses are not divided across production units.

Absorption Costing Meaning: 

It is also called "full costing." Absorption costing accounting management is a way to collect all costs that are related to the production of a specific product. This method accounts for direct as well as indirect costs such as direct material, direct labour, rent, and insurance. Absorption costing involves any direct cost in the production of a good, including its cost base.

As part of the product costs, absorption costing includes fixed overhead charges. Wages for staff physically working on the good or service, raw materials used in production, and all overhead costs such as all utility costs are among the expenses involved with manufacturing a product.

Also Read: Difference Between Cost Accounting and Financial Accounting

Disadvantages of Absorption Costing 

There are various downsides to absorption costs, which include:

  • It gives a below-par appraisal of how much things cost.
  • Because all fixed expenses are not deducted from revenue until the items are sold, it may hurt a company's profit.
  • Ineffective in Decision Making:

Difference Between Marginal and Absorption Costing

Marginal Costing

Absorption Costing

Under marginal costing, only variable expenses are applied to inventory.

Under absorption costing, fixed and variable overhead costs are both applied.

With marginal costing, the profitability of each individual sale appears to be higher.

With absorption costing, profitability appears to be on the lower side.

Profits are calculated using the contribution margin (which excludes applied overhead) in marginal costing.

Profits are calculated using gross margin (which includes applied overhead) in absorption costing.

Marginal costing is a method where variable costs are entirely allocated to the components.

In absorption costing, fixed costs are considered for item-related expenses distinct from variable costs.

In marginal costing, product-related costs only include element costs.

When absorption costing is considered, it describes expenses in the following classifications: production, administration & selling, and distribution.

Overheads are a further division of marginal costs. Consider fixed and variable overheads as examples.

In absorption costing, where the per-unit price will increase or decrease as a result of stock variations.

Also Read: What Is Vouching in Accounting?

Conclusion:

Using absorption costing, you assign a fixed cost of creation to the outcome, whereas marginal costing ignores it, so you can observe differences between the benefits produced by the two costing methods. Furthermore, since fixed expenses remain the same regardless of results, absorption costing adjusts to the genuine and planned levels at the time of recovery.

Follow Khatabook for the latest updates, news blogs, and articles related to micro, small and medium businesses (MSMEs), business tips, income tax, GST, salary, and accounting.

Disclaimer :
The information, product and services provided on this website are provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis without any warranty or representation, express or implied. Khatabook Blogs are meant purely for educational discussion of financial products and services. Khatabook does not make a guarantee that the service will meet your requirements, or that it will be uninterrupted, timely and secure, and that errors, if any, will be corrected. The material and information contained herein is for general information purposes only. Consult a professional before relying on the information to make any legal, financial or business decisions. Use this information strictly at your own risk. Khatabook will not be liable for any false, inaccurate or incomplete information present on the website. Although every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in this website is updated, relevant and accurate, Khatabook makes no guarantees about the completeness, reliability, accuracy, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, product, services or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Khatabook will not be liable for the website being temporarily unavailable, due to any technical issues or otherwise, beyond its control and for any loss or damage suffered as a result of the use of or access to, or inability to use or access to this website whatsoever.

What is the main difference between absorption costing and marginal costing?

Marginal costing is a technique that assumes only variable costs as product costs. Absorption costing is a technique that assumes both fixed costs and variable costs as product costs.

What is the basic difference between absorption costing and variable costing?

Absorption costing entails allocating fixed overhead costs to all units produced for an accounting period. Variable costing includes all of the variable direct costs in COGS but excludes direct, fixed overhead costs.

What is the difference between marginal costing and variable costing?

5. In case of marginal costing the cost per unit remains the same, irrespective of the production as it is valued at variable cost In case of absorption costing the cost per unit reduces, as the production increases as it is fixed cost which reduces, whereas, the variable cost remains the same per unit.

What is the difference between absorption costing and variable costing quizlet?

What is the difference between full absorption costing and variable costing? In full absorption costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is included in the cost of the product. In variable costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed.