What aspect of kelley’s covariation theory considers the repeated late arrival of student x?

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc, personality, and interest correlates. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55B, 69–84.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2009). Personality and intelligence. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 162–174). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Bowen, K. R. (2002). What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. & Goff, M. (1994). Typical intellectual engagement and personality: Reply to Rocklin (1994). Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 150–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five Factor Model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.). Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 319–349). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, T. A., Rueter, A. R., Abram, S. V., Brown, J. S., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality and neural correlates of mentalizing ability. European Journal of Personality, 31, 599–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: Component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Blas, L. D., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the Openness/Intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Gibson, G. J. (1997). Relationship between ability and personality: Three hypotheses tested. Intelligence, 25, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, A. J., Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Fowkes, F. G. R., Padersen, N. L., Rabbitt, P., Bent, N., & McInnes, L. (2002). Relationships between ability and personality: Does intelligence contribute positively to personal and social adjustment? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1391–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, T. J., & Bichsel, J. (2006). Personality predictors of intelligence: Differences between young and cognitively healthy older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 861–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchard, K. A. (2003). Does emotional intelligence assist in the prediction of academic success? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 840–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, T. C., & Shieles, A. (2003). Crystallized intelligence as a product of speed and drive for experience: The relationship of inspection time and openness to g and Gc. Intelligence, 31, 275−287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Jauk, E., … Silvia, P. J. (2016). Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Human Brain Mapping, 37(2), 773–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauducel, A., Liepmann, D., Felfe, J., & Nettelnstroth, W. (2007). The impact of different measurement models for fluid and crystallized intelligence on the correlation with personality traits. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergold, S., & Steinmayr, R. (2018). Personality and intelligence interact in the prediction of academic achievement. Journal of Intelligence, 6, 27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later, Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchard, T., Segal, N., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M., & Krueger, R. (2003). Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson–Patterson conservatism scale: A reared-apart twins study of social attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 959–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brickenkamp, R. (1975). Handbuch psychologischer und padagogischer Tests [Handbook of Psychological and Educational Tests]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Brody, N. (2004). What cognitive intelligence is and what emotional intelligence is not. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 234–238.Google Scholar

Brugger, P. (2001). From haunted brain to haunted science. A cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought. In Houran, J. & Lange, R (Eds.), Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 195–215). Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar

Bunge, S. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals differing in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, D., Jost, J., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1978). Scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B., & Birkett, H. (1980). The known personality factors found aligned between first order T-data and second order Q-data factors, with new evidence on the inhibitory control, independence and regression traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B., & Warburton, F. W. (1967). Objective personality and motivation tests: A theoretical introduction and practical compendium. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Moutafi, J., & Furnham, A. (2005). The relationship between personality traits, subjectively-assessed and fluid intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1517–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, B., Duberstein, P., Tindle, H. A., Sink, K. M., Robbins, J., Tancredi, D. J., & Franks, P. (2012). Personality predicts cognitive function over 7 years in older persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 612–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collis, J. M., & Messick, S. (Eds.) (2001). Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

De Pauw, S. S. W., Mervielde, I., & Van Leeuwen, K. G. (2009). How are traits related to problem behavior in preschoolers? Similarities and contrasts between temperament and personality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deary, I. J., Batty, G. D., & Gale, C. R. (2008). Bright children become enlightened adults. Psychological Science, 19, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and personality. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 711–737). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015a). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015b). Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In Cooper, M. L. & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.), The APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences, Vol. 4 (pp. 369–399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Carey, B. E., Krueger, B. F., & Ross, S. R. (2016). Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of Openness/Intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., Séguin, J. R., Pihl, R. O., & Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Externalizing behavior and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 947–953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to Experience, Intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., & Rueter, A. R. (2016). Impulsivity as a personality trait. In Vohs, K. D. & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (3rd ed., pp. 345–363). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Shamosh, N. A., Green, A. E., Braver, T. S., & Gray, J. R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from Openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doerfler, T., & Hornke, L. F. (2010). Working style and extraversion: New insights into the nature of item response latencies in computer-based intelligence testing. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Espejo, J., Day, E. A., & Scott, G. (2005). Performance evaluations, need for cognition, and the acquisition of a complex skill: An attribute–treatment interaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1867–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Personality and intelligence: Psychometric and experimental approaches. In Sternberg, R. J. & Ruzgis, P. (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 3–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fales, C. L., Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Mennin, D. S., Braver, T. S., & Gray, J. R. (2008). Anxiety and cognitive efficiency: Differential modulation of transient and sustained neural activity during a working memory task. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, P. A., & Kasten, N. (2012). How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 296–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., Dissou, G., Sloan, P., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and intelligence in business people: A study of two personality and two intelligence measures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabriel, M. T., Critelli, J. W., & Ee, J. S. (1994). Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. Journal of Personality, 62, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gläscher, J., Rudrauf, D., Colom, R., Paul, L. K., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(10), 4705–4709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Personality–intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R., & Rosolack, T. K. (1994). The big five factor structure as an integrative framework: An empirical comparison with Eysenck’s P-E-N model. In Halverson, C. F., Jr., Kohnstamm, G. A., & Martin, R. P. (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 7–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997b). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gow, A. J., Whiteman, M. C., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J. (2005). The personality–intelligence interface: Insights from an ageing cohort. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, B. D., Foster, J. D., Elliott, E. M., Shelton, J. T., McCain, J., & Gouvier, W. D. (2013). Need for cognition is related to higher general intelligence, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence, but not working memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(1), 22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2003). Impulsive decision making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 298−306.Google ScholarPubMed

Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X., & Peterson, J. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness with political ideology and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hofstee, W. K. B., Kiers, H. A., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1997). A comparison of Big Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15–31.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, D. C., Dollinger, S. J., Holland, C. J., & MacDonald, D. A. (1995). The relationship between psychometric intelligence and the five-factor model of personality in a rehabilitation sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 79–88.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., & Yarmel, P. W. (1987). Intellectual functioning and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 232–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jang, K. L., Hu, S., Livesley, W. J., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History: measurement, and conceptual issue. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality, 8, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2005a). The structure of human intelligence: It’s verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid-crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2005b). Constructive replication of the visual–perceptual-image rotation model in Thurstone’s (1941) battery of 60 tests of mental ability, Intelligence, 33, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2007). Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie. Intelligence, 35, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., Tellegen, A., Keyes, M., & Gottesman, I. I. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the Verbal-Perceptual-Image Rotation (VPR) model of the structure of mental abilities in the Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Intelligence, 35, 542–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W., Nijenhuis, J., & Bouchard, T. J. (2007). Replication of the hierarchical visual–perceptual-image rotation model in de Wolff and Buiten’s (1963) battery of 46 tests of mental ability. Intelligence, 35, 69−81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Self estimates of general, crystallized, and fluid intelligences in an ethnically diverse population. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to Experience and Intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keightley, M. L., Seminowicz, D. A., Bagby, R. M., Costa, P. T., Fossati, P., & Mayberg, H. S. (2003). Personality influences limbic-cortical interactions during sad mood. NeuroImage, 20, 2031–2039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kirby, K. N. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koenen, K. C., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Rijsdijk, F., & Taylor, A. (2006). Genetic influences on the overlap between low IQ and antisocial behavior in young children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 787–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koenig, L. B., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on the Traditional Moral Values Triad – Authoritarianism, Conservatism and Religiousness – as assessed by quantitative behavior genetic methods. In McNamara, P. (Ed.), Where god and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion, Vol. 1, Evolution, genes, and the religious brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Process Overlap Theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence, Psychological Inquiry, 27, 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., & Kramer, M. D. (2007). Linking antisocial behavior, substance use, and personality: An integrative quantitative model of the adult externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 645–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuntsi, J., Eley, T.C., Taylor, A., Hughes, C., Asherson, P., Caspi, A., et al. (2004). Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 124, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leikas, S., Mäkinen, S., Lönnqvist, J. E., & Verkasalo, M. (2009). Cognitive ability × emotional stability interactions on adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 23(4), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.Google Scholar

Ludeke, S. G., Rasmussen, S. H. R., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Verbal ability drives the link between intelligence and ideology in two American community samples. Intelligence, 61, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1993). Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mahalingam, V., Stillwell, D., Kosinski, M., Rust, J., & Kogan, A. (2014). Who can wait for the future? A personality perspective. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Comparing models of intelligence in Project TALENT: The VPR model fits better than the CHC and extended Gf–Gc models. Intelligence, 40, 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2014). Linear and nonlinear associations between general intelligence and personality in Project TALENT. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(4), 638–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 60, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63, 503–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCrae, R. R. (1993). Openness to Experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 13, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of Openness to Experience. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). Boston: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. F., & Tal, I. R. (2007). Schizotypy versus openness and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39, 765–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2003). Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the NEO Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2006). What facets of openness and conscientiousness predict fluid intelligence score? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2004). Why is Conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1013–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Tsaousis, I. (2006). Is the relationship between intelligence and trait neuroticism mediated by test anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 587–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussel, P. (2013). Intellect: A theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 885–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr, Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., … & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American psychologist, 51(2), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nettle, D., & Liddle, B. (2008). Agreeableness is related to social-cognitive, but not social-perceptual, theory of mind. European Journal of Personality, 22, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nolan, S. A., Roberts, J. E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Neuroticism and ruminative response style as predictors of change in depressive symptomatology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are openness and intellect distinct aspects of openness to experience? A test of the O/I model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 571–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2016). Self-pathology, the five-factor model, and bloated specific factors: A cautionary tale. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Schittekatte, M., & De Pauw, S. (2015). The association of cognitive ability with right‐wing ideological attitudes and prejudice: A meta‐analytic review. European Journal of Personality, 29(6), 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, D., Wootton, L. W., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Are liberals agreeable or not? Politeness and Compassion differentially predict political conservatism via distinct ideologies. Social Psychology, 44, 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostaszewski, P. (1996). The relation between temperament and rate of temporal discounting. European Journal of Personality, 10, 161–172.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (1994). Reflections on different labels for Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., Lysy, D. C., & Yik, M. S. M. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66, 525–554.Google Scholar

Pedulla, J. J., Airasian, P. W., Madaus, G. F. (1980). Do teacher ratings and standardized test results of students yield the same information? American Educational Research Journal, 17, 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, A. M., & Corr, P. J. (2006). Cognitive ability as a buffer to neuroticism: Churchill’s secret weapon? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, J. B., & Flanders, J. L. (2002). Complexity management theory: Motivation for ideological rigidity and social conflict. Cortex, 38, 429–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pickering, A. D. (2004). The neuropsychology of impulsive antisocial sensation seeking personality traits: From dopamine to hippocampal function? In Stelmack, R. M. (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 453–477). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pietschnig, J., & Voracek, M. (2015). One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909–2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 282–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pytlik Zillig, L. M., Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral and cognitive processes represented in the Big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raine, A., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Lynam, D. (2005). Neurocognitive impairments in boys on the life-course persistent antisocial path. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reeve, C. L., Meyer, R. D., & Bonaccio, S. (2006). Intelligence–personality associations reconsidered: The importance of distinguishing between general and narrow dimensions of intelligence. Intelligence, 34, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, J. B., Zhang, L., Mitchell, S., & de Wit, H. (1999). Delay and probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality, 65, 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., & Hill, P. L. (2014). What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? Developmental Psychology, 50, 1315–1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., MacCann, C. (2008). The measurement of emotional intelligence: A decade of progress? In Boyle, G., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Rueter, A. R., Abram, S. V., MacDonald, A. W., Rustichini, A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2018). The goal priority network as a neural substrate of Conscientiousness. Human Brain Mapping, 39(9), 3574–3585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saklofske, D. H., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.) (1995). International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Emmendorfer, A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2017). Dissecting the parieto-frontal correlates of fluid intelligence: A comprehensive ALE meta-analysis study. Intelligence, 63, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (1992). Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 6, 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (1994). Trapnell versus the lexical factor: More ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 8, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulte, M. J., Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Not much more than g and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1059–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Séguin, J. R., Boulerice, B., Harden, P., Tremblay, R. E., & Pihl, R. O. (1999). Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory, and IQ. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 1197–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shamosh, N. A., DeYoung, C. G., Green, A. E., Reis, D. L., Johnson, M. R., Conway, A. R. A. et al. (2008). Individual differences in delay discounting: Relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 19, 904–911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shamosh, N.A., & Gray, J.R. (2008). Delay discounting and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 38, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shiner, R. L., & DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The structure of temperament and personality traits: A developmental perspective. In Zelazo, P. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 113–141). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual differences, 44(4), 1012–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smillie, L. D., Varsavsky, V., Avery, R. E., & Perry, R. (2016). Trait intellect predicts cognitive engagement: Evidence from a resource allocation perspective. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanek, K. C. (2014). Meta-analyses of personality and cognitive ability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). What explains boys’ stronger confidence in their intelligence? Sex Roles, 61, 736–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Ruzgis, P. (Eds.) (1994). Personality and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Swann, A. C., Bjork, J. M., Moeller, F. G., & Dougherty, D. M. (2002). Two models of impulsivity: relationship to personality traits and psychopathology. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 988–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Syzmanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigil-Colet, A., & Morales-Vives, F. (2005). How impulsivity is related to intelligence and academic achievement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Von Stumm, S., & Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Investment and intellect: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 841–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wacker, J., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). Trait extraversion and dopamine function. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(6), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wainwright, M. A., Wright, M. J., Luciano, M., Geffen, G. M., & Martin, N. G. (2008). Genetic covariation among facets of openness to experience and general cognitive ability. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wallace, J. (1966). An abilities conception of personality: Some implications for personality measurement. American Psychologist, 21, 132–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waller, N. G., DeYoung, C. G., & Bouchard, T. J. (2016). The recaptured scale technique: A method for testing the structural robustness of personality scales. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 433–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, R. W. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willerman, L., Turner, R. G., & Peterson, M. (1976). A comparison of the predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2015). Affect, behaviour, cognition and desire in the Big Five: An analysis of item content and structure. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 478–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolf, M. B., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., & Stark, S. E. (2014). Openness to experience: Its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Conz, G. (2014). Validity of six openness facets in predicting work behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 76–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K. et al. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 987–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 581–610). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, J., & Ziegler, M. (2015). Interaction effects between openness and fluid intelligence predicting scholastic performance. Journal of Intelligence, 3, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Heene, M., Asendorpf, J., & Bühner, M. (2012). Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 1–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Ash, G. E., & Baumann, J. F. (2017). Vocabulary and reading comprehension: The nexus of meaning. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed, pp. 377–405). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barro, R. J., & Lee, J-W. (2015). Education matters: Global schooling gains from the 19th to the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1 & 2), i–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceci, S. J., Barnett, S. M., & Kanaya, T. (2003). Developing childhood proclivities into adult competencies: The overlooked multiplier effect. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 70–93). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2003). The search for general abilities and basic capacities: Theoretical implications from the modifiability and complexity of mechanisms mediating expert performance. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 93–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (1998). IQ gains over time: Toward finding the causes. In Neisser, U. (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 25–66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (2009). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, A., Yen, L., Yang, N. J., Braun, M., & O’Connor, R. E. (2001). Is reading in reading readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Griffin, S.A., Case, R., & Siegler, R.S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hinsley, D., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations. In Carpenter, P. & Just, M. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. D. (2016). Great myths of education and learning. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, E. (2011). Human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Dyson, N., Hassinger-Das, B., & Irwin, C. (2012). Building kindergartners’ number sense: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 647–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalyuga, S. (2014). The expertise reversal principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed, pp. 576–597). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krampe, R. T., & Baltes, P. B. (2003). Intelligence as adaptive resource development and resource allocation: A new look through the lenses of SOC and Expertise. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 31–70). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipson, M. Y. (1983). The influence of religious affiliation on children’s memory for text information. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 448–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marr, M. B., & Gormley, K. (1982). Children’s recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinez, M. E. (2000). Education as the cultivation of intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Massa, L. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1981). Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra story problems into families, categories, and templates. Instructional Science, 10, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2003a). E. L. Thorndike’s enduring contributions to educational psychology. In Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 113–154). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2003b). What causes individual differences in cognitive performance? In R. Sternberg, J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 263–274). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google ScholarPubMed

Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pearson, P. D., Hanson, J., & Gordon, C. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children’s comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelligrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ponce, H. R., Lopez, M. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). A computer-based spatial learning strategy approach that improves reading comprehension and writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 819–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, S. K. (1999). Word problems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Riley, M., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. (1982). The development of children’s problem solving ability in arithmetic. In Ginsburg, H. (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–196). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schumacher, R. F., & Fuchs, L. S. (2011). Does understanding relational terminology mediate effects of intervention on compare word problems? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 2012, 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds). (2003). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & The Rainbow Project Collaborators (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L.-F. (Eds.). (2001). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar

Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wentzel, K. R., & Miele, D. B. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of motivation at school. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wolf, T. H. (1973). Alfred Binet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zwick, R. (2002). Fair game: The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Andreoletti, C., & Lachman, M. E. (2004). Susceptibility and resilience to memory aging stereotypes: Education matters more than age. Experimental Aging Research, 30(2), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Arousal and stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1913). A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children (trans. C. H. Town). Lincoln, IL: Courier.Google Scholar

Binet, A. (1909/1975). Modern ideas about children (trans. S. Heisler). Menlo Park, CA: Suzanne Heisler.Google Scholar

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., & Pinel, E. C. (2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. P., & Josephs, R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., & Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16(7), 572–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carr, P. B., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Stereotype threat and inflexible perseverance in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 853–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claxton, G., & Meadows, S. (2009). Brightening up: How children learn to be gifted. In Balchin, T., Hymer, B., & Matthews, D. J. (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 3–9). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Colombo, J., Shaddy, D. J., Blaga, O. M., Anderson, C. J., & Kannass, K. N. (2009). High cognitive ability in infancy and early childhood. In Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. (Eds.), The development of gift-edness and talent across the life-span (pp. 23–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, J. J. (1984). The hierarchy of consistency: A review and model of longitudinal findings on adult individual differences in intelligence, personality and self-opinion. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croizet, J., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cury, F., Da Fonseca, D., Zahn, I., & Elliot, A. (2008). Implicit theories and IQ test performance: A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dai, D. Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Beyond cognitivism: Toward an integrated understanding of intellectual functioning and development. In Dai, D.Y. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Exposure to scientific theories affects women’s math performance. Science, 314(5798), 435–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318(5855), 1387–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dowsett, S. M., & Livesey, D. J. (2000). The development of inhibitory control in preschool children: Effects of “executive skills” training. Developmental Psychobiology, 36(2), 161–174.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dweck, C. S. (2009a). Foreword. In Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life-span (pp. xi–xiv). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2009b). Self-theories and giftedness: A reflective conversation. In Balchin, T., Hymer, B., & Matthews, D. J. (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 308–316). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M. M., Cwik, M. F., Stalets, M. M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T. E. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 465–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gagné, F. (2009). Talent development as seen through the differentiated model of talent and giftedness. In Balchin, T., Hymer, B., & Matthews, D. J. (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 32–41). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1892). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 659–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, R. B., Calkins, S. D., Anastopoulos, A. D., Keane, S. P., & Shelton, T. L. (2003). Regulatory contributors to children’s kindergarten achievement. Early Education and Development, 14(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hymer, B. J. (2009). Beyond compare? Thoughts towards an inclusional, fluid and non-normative understanding of giftedness. In Balchin, T., Hymer, B., & Matthews, D. J. (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 299–307). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Janda, L. (1996). The psychologists’ book of self-tests. New York: Berkley Books.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–46). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krendl, A. C., Richeson, J. A., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2008). The negative consequences of threat: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women’s underperformance in math. Psychological Science, 19(2), 168–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “over-justification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2007). Links between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 947–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mendoza-Denton, R., Kahn, K., & Chan, W. (2008). Can fixed views of ability boost performance in the context of favorable stereotypes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1187–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moser, J. S., Schroder, H. S., Heeter, C., Moran, T. P., & Lee, Y.-H. (2011). Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1484–1489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nguyen, H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Brien, L. T., & Crandall, C. S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 782–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ponitz, C. C., McClelland, M. M., Matthews, J. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ramsden, S., Richardson, F.M., Josse, G., Thomas, M., … & Price, C.J. (2011). Verbal and nonverbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain. Nature, 479(7371), 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1977). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar

Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rueda,  R. M., Rothbart,  M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 14931–14936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Looking beyond rewards: The problem and promise of intrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 1–13). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siegler, R. S. (1992). The other Alfred Binet. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic mode and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 270–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

St. Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 745–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Intelligence, competence and expertise. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 15–30). New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). (2001). Environmental effects on cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Subotnik, R. F. (2009). Developmental transitions in giftedness and talent: Adolescence into adulthood. In Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life-span (pp. 155–170). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelligence scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life, Vol. 5. Oxford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Swanson, J., & Reiser, M. (2008). Prediction of children’s academic competence from their effortful control, relationships, and classroom participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 468–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1132–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wechsler, D. (1996) Eschelle d’Intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants Troisieme Edition (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Third Edition). Paris: ECPA (Original work published 1971).Google Scholar

Wolfe, R. N., & Johnson, S. D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(2), 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aljughaiman, A, & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arenius, P., Engel, Y., & Klyver, K. (2017). No particular action needed? A necessary condition analysis of gestation activities and firm emergence. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avitia, M. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Beyond g and c: The relationship of rated creativity to long-term storage and retrieval (Glr). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The Amusement Park Theoretical Model of Creativity: An attempt to bridge the domain specificity/generality gap. In Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 8–17). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative justice? The relationship between prospective teachers’ prior schooling experiences and perceived importance of promoting student creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blair, C. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandau, H., Daghofer, F., Hollerer, L., Kaschnitz, W., Kirchmair, G., Krammer, I., & Schlagbauer, A. (2007). The relationship between creativity, teacher ratings on behavior, age, and gender in pupils from seven to ten years. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B., & Butcher, H. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Dul, J. (2016a). Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 10–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dul, J., Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (in press). Necessary condition analysis in creativity research. In Dörfler, V. & Stierand, M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on creativity. New York: Edward Elgar.

Dumas, D. (2018). Relational reasoning and divergent thinking: An examination of the threshold hypothesis with quantile regression. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finke, R. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Finke, R. A., & Slayton, K. (1988). Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory and Cognition, 16, 252–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, D. P., & Ortiz, S. O. (2002). Best practices in intellectual assessment: Future directions. In Thomas, A. & Grimes, J. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1351–1372). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar

Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs-Beauchamp, K. D., Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1993). Creativity and intelligence in preschoolers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the Structure-of-Intellect Model. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 48, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. M., Williamson, R. L., & Carter, N. T. (2018). A conditional threshold hypothesis for creative achievement: On the interaction between intelligence and openness. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000182CrossRef

Hartman, E. (2000). Dreams and nightmares: The origin and meaning of dreams. New York: Perseus.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Karwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, (Advance online publication). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000208CrossRef

Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., Chruszczewski, M. H., & Benedek, M. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J. C., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2017). Intelligence in childhood and creative achievements in middle-age: The necessary condition approach. Intelligence, 64, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, A. S. (2009). IQ Testing 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Why creativity isn’t in IQ tests, why it matters, and why it won’t change anytime soon …. Probably. Journal of Intelligence 3, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (Eds.) (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 82, 248–258.Google Scholar

Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2007). A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 35, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mednick, S. A. (1968). The Remote Associates Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner’s manual: Remote Associates Test. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Meeker, M. N. (1969). The structure of intellect: Its interpretation and uses. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar

Mourgues, C. V., Tan, M., Hein, S., Al-Harbi, K., Aljughaiman, A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). The relationship between analytical and creative cognitive skills from middle childhood to adolescence: Testing the threshold theory in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Lonergan, D. C., & Scott, G. M. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22, 21–30.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pesut, D. J. (1990). Creative thinking as a self‐regulatory metacognitive process: A model for education, training and further research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A. (2016). Creative articulation. In Plucker, J. A. (Ed.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 151–163). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. J. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (1973). New directions in creativity. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 212–218.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Assessing the accuracy of judgments of originality on three divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, 5–14.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99–144). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & McDonough, E. M. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 99–144). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Shi, B., Wang, L., Yang, J., Zhang, M., & Xu, L. (2017). Relationship between divergent thinking and intelligence: An empirical study of the threshold hypothesis with Chinese children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Silvia, P. J. (2008a). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2008b). Creativity and intelligence revisited: A latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: General and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41, 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, S, 2–12.CrossRef

Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 50–67,CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Applied intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Defying the crowd. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & The Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessment of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swanson, H. L. (1992). The relationship between metacognition and problem solving in gifted children. Roeper Review, 15, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Directions manual and scoring guide. Verbal test booklet A. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2014). WISC-V Technical and interpretive manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar

Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valk, W. van der, Sumo, R., Dul, J., & Schroeder, R. (2016). When are contracts and trust necessary for innovation in buyer-supplier relationships? A Necessary Condition Analysis. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamamoto, K. (1964). Role of creative thinking and intelligence in high school achievement. Psychological Reports, 14(3), 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yu, K., Lu, Z., & Stander, J. (2003). Quantile regression: Applications and current research areas. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, 331–350.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2014). Adolescent and adult intellectual development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 246–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ackerman, P. L., & Kanfer, R. (2004). Cognitive, affective, and conative aspects of adult intellect within a typical and maximal performance framework. In Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 119–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Adams, M. J. (1993). Towards making it happen. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alós-Ferrer, C., & Strack, F. (2014). From dual processes to multiple selves: Implications for economic behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic? Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron, J. (1993). Why teach thinking?–An essay. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, J. (2014). Heuristics and biases. In Zamir, E. & Teichman, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, J., Bazerman, M. H., & Shonk, K. (2006). Enlarging the societal pie through wise legislation. A psychological perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burgess, G. C., Gray, J. R., Conway, A. R., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 674–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 288–300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory for fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1998). Where is intelligence? Some answers from the triadic theory. In McArdle, J. J. & Woodcock, R. W. (Eds.), Human cognitive abilities in theory and practice (pp. 29–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Chein, J., & Schneider, W. (2012). The brain’s learning and control architecture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chuderski, A. (2014). The relational integration task explains fluid reasoning above and beyond other working memory tasks. Memory and Cognition, 42, 448–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chuderski, A. (2015). The broad factor of working memory is virtually isomorphic to fluid intelligence tested under time pressure. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20–33.Google Scholar

Corser, R., & Jasper, J. D. (2014). Enhanced activation of the left hemisphere promotes normative decision making. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(3), 368–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1976). Shallow psychology. In Carroll, J. S. & Payne, J. W. (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior (pp. 3–11). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T, & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 497–548). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychometrics to the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Neys, W. (Ed.) (2018). Dual process theory 2.0. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

de Sousa, R. (2007). Why think? Evolution and the rational mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Duncan, J. (2010). How intelligence happens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, J., Parr, A., Woolgar, A., Thompson, R., Bright, P., Cox, S., Bishop, S., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (2008). Goal neglect and Spearman’s g: Competing parts of a complex task. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 137, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., Conway, A. R. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (2010). Working memory and fluid intelligence in young children. Intelligence, 38, 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engle, R. W. (2018). Working memory and executive attention: A revisit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 190–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 447–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Etzioni, Amitai. (2014). Treating rationality as a continuous variable. Society, 51, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 378–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed