Which of the following is a criticism of the social cognitive approach to personality?

Video Transcript

Hi, everybody. So today I'm gonna be going over problem number five in Chapter 13 personality. And this is testing our knowledge of the social cognitive approach or I'll just write social cognitive theory. So let's first define what this is, so I will right here. So essentially, the social cognitive theory postulates that a person's behavior influences both personal factors. So these are essentially cognitive factors, beliefs, attitudes, things like that and also situational factors or environmental factors. So these air things like social norms and the people that you surround yourself with, um, and also these different factors, then go back and influence a person's behavior as well. So I'm going to sum that up and write that down here. So a person's behavior influences and is, and the flu ends. Bye environmental factors. So these air things like social norms, culture and family and friends and personal factors. So these air things like cognition, knowledge, beliefs and thoughts. So essentially the behavior, the personal factors and environmental factors kind of all influence one another. So something to note about the social cognitive theory is one of the major criticisms. Some write that down here criticism. So a major criticism of the social cognitive theory is that it largely focuses on, um, uh, it kind of ignores a person's inner traits, and instead it says that personality is largely determined by, like, situational influences. So we write that down here. So it ignores, be persons inner treats and focuses too heavily on situational influences.

The social-cognitive theory of personality emphasizes both learning and cognition as sources of individual differences in personality. It posits that portions of an individual's knowledge acquisition can be directly related to observing others within the context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media influences. This means that an individual can learn from observing others, as opposed to only being able to learn from their own experiences. This approach emphasizes both the environment and the individual's own traits as important factors in personality development. 

Criticisms of the Social-Cognitive Theory

One of the main criticisms of the social-cognitive theory is that it is not a unified theory. This means that the different aspects of the theory may not be connected. For example, researchers currently cannot find a connection between observational learning and self-efficacy within the social-cognitive perspective. The theory is so broad that not all of its component parts are fully understood and integrated into a single explanation of learning and personality.

The findings associated with this theory are still, for the most part, preliminary. It does not provide a full explanation or description of how social cognition, behavior, environment, and personality are related, although there are several hypotheses.

Reciprocal determinism

Critics of social-cognitive theory argue that the theory does not provide a full explanation of how social cognition, behavior, environment, and personality are related (known as "reciprocal determinism").

Another limitation is that not all social learning can be directly observed. Because of this, it can be difficult to quantify the effect that social cognition has on development. Similarly, many aspects of personality are subjective and can be equally hard to measure and quantify.

Finally, this theory tends to ignore maturation throughout the lifespan. Because of this, the understanding of how a child learns through observation and how an adult learns through observation are not differentiated, and factors of development are not included.

Are you outgoing because that's simply who you are, or are you outgoing because you came from an outgoing family and spent your whole life observing their behavior? Social-cognitive theory of personality explore these questions.

• What is the definition of the social-cognitive theory of personality?
• What is Albert Bandura's social-cognitive theory?
• What are some social-cognitive theories of personality examples?
• What are some applications of the social-cognitive theory?
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of the social-cognitive theory?

Social-Cognitive Theory of Personality Definition

The behaviorism theory of personality believes all behavior and traits are learned through classical and (mostly) operant conditioning. If we behave in a way that reaps the rewards, we are more likely to repeat them. If, however, those behaviors are punished or perhaps ignored, they are weakened, and we are less likely to repeat them. The social-cognitive theory stems from the behaviorist view that behaviors and traits are learned but takes it one step further.

The social-cognitive theory of personality states that our traits and social environments interact with one another, and those traits are learned through observation or imitation.

Behaviorism theories of personality believe learning traits is a one-way street - environment affects behavior. However, the social-cognitive theory of personality is similar to the gene-environment interaction in that it is a two-way street. Just as our genes and environment interact to where one can affect the other, so do our personality and social contexts.

Social-cognitive theories of personality also emphasize that our mental processes (how we think) impact our behavior. Our expectations, memories, and schemes can all affect our behavior.

Internal-external locus of control is a term used to describe the degree of personal control we believe we have over our lives.

If you have an internal locus of control, you believe that your abilities can impact outcomes in your life. If you work hard, you believe that it will help you achieve your goals. On the other hand, if you have an external locus of control, you believe you have very little control over the outcomes in your life. You see no reason to work hard or give your best effort because you do not think it would make any difference.

Albert Bandura: Social-Cognitive Theory

Albert Bandura pioneered the social-cognitive theory of personality. He agreed with behaviorist B.F. Skinner's view that humans learn behaviors and personality traits by operant conditioning. However, he believed that it is also influenced by observational learning.

B.F. Skinner may say that a person is shy because perhaps their parents were controlling, and they were punished any time they spoke out of turn. Albert Bandura may say that a person is shy because their parents were also shy, and they observed this as a child.

There is a basic process that is required for observational learning to occur. First, you must pay attention to someone else’s behavior as well as the consequences. You must be able to retain what you observed in your memories as you may not need to use it right away. Next, you must be able to reproduce the observed behavior. And finally, you must be motivated to copy the behavior. If you are not motivated, it is unlikely for you to reproduce that behavior.

Reciprocal Determinism

As mentioned earlier, social-cognitive theories emphasize the interaction between personality and social contexts. Bandura expanded this idea with the concept of reciprocal determinism.

Reciprocal determinism states that internal factors, environment, and behavior intertwine to determine our behavior and traits.

This means that we are both products and manufacturers of our environment. Our behavior can impact our social contexts, which can affect our personality traits, our behavior, and so on. Reciprocal determinism says these three factors occur in a loop. Here are some ways reciprocal determinism can occur.

1. Behavior - We all have different interests, ideas, and passions, and therefore, we will all choose different environments. Our choices, actions, statements, or achievements all shape our personalities. For example, someone who likes a challenge could be drawn to CrossFit, or someone artistic could be drawn to a calligraphy class. The different environments we choose shape who we are.

2. Personal factors - Our goals, values, beliefs, cultures, or expectations can all influence and shape the way we interpret our social environment. For example, people prone to anxiety may perceive the world as dangerous and actively look out for threats and notice them more than others.

3. Environment - The feedback, reinforcement, or instruction we receive from others can also impact our personality traits. And our personality traits can influence how we see others and how we believe we are being perceived. This, in turn, can impact how we react to a situation. For example, if you perceive that your friends think you don't talk enough, you may try to start talking more.

Jane loves a good challenge (personal factor), so she decided to take CrossFit (behavior). She spends six days a week at her gym, and most of her closest friends train with her. Jane has a huge following on their CrossFit account on Instagram (environmental factor), so she has to create content at the gym continually.

Social-Cognitive Theories of Personality: Examples

Bandura and a team of researchers conducted a study called the "Bobo Doll Experiment" to test the impact of observational learning in the absence of direct reinforcement. In this study, children ages 3 to 6 were asked to observe an adult act aggressively either in person, in a live film, or a cartoon.

The children are then prompted to play after a researcher removes the first toy the child picks up. Then, they observed the children's behavior. Children who observed aggressive behavior were more likely to imitate it than the control group. Additionally, the more remote the model for aggression is from reality, the less total and imitative aggression was displayed by the children.

Regardless, the fact that children still imitated aggressive behavior after viewing a live film or cartoon raises implications about the effect of violence in the media. Repeated exposure to aggression and violence can cause a desensitization effect.

The desensitization effect is the phenomenon in which emotional responsiveness to negative or aversive stimuli diminishes after repeated exposure.

This can lead to cognitive, behavioral, and affective consequences. We may notice that our aggression has increased or our desire to help has decreased.

Social-Cognitive Theory: Applications

The social-cognitive theory can be applied to understand and predict behavior in various settings, from education to the workplace. Another side to the social-cognitive theory we have not yet discussed is what it says about predicting behavior. According to the social-cognitive theory of personality, a person's behavior and past traits are the greatest predictors of their future behavior or traits in similar situations. So if a friend consistently makes plans to hang out but bails at the last minute, this is the greatest predictor of whether or not this will happen again. However, this is not to say that people never change and will always continue the same behavior.

While our past behaviors can predict how well we do in the future, this phenomenon can also impact our self-efficacy or beliefs about ourselves and our ability to achieve the desired outcome.

If your self-efficacy is high, you may not be phased by the fact that you failed in the past and will do what it takes to overcome obstacles. However, if self-efficacy is low, we can be significantly impacted by the outcome of past experiences. Still, self-efficacy is not only made up of our past performance experiences but also observational learning, verbal persuasion (encouraging/discouraging messages from others and ourselves), and emotional arousal.

Social-Cognitive Theory: Advantages and Disadvantages

There are several advantages to the social-cognitive theory. For one, it is grounded in scientific research and study. This comes as no surprise as it combines two of the most scientifically-based fields of study in psychology -- behavior and cognition. Social-cognitive theory research can be measured, defined, and researched with a fair amount of precision. It has revealed how personality can be both stable and fluid due to our ever-changing social contexts and environments.

However, the social-cognitive theory is not without its shortcomings. For example, some critics say that it focuses too much on the situation or social context and fails to acknowledge one's innermost, innate traits. While our environment can influence our behavior and personality traits, the social-cognitive theory downplays our unconscious emotions, motives, and traits that cannot help but shine through.

Social Cognitive Theory of Personality - Key takeaways

• The social-cognitive theory of personality states that our traits and social environments interact with one another, and those traits are learned through observation or imitation.
  • The social-cognitive theory of personality is similar to the gene-environment interaction in that it is a two-way street. Just as our genes and environment interact to where one can affect the other, so do our personality and social contexts.
• Internal-external locus of control is a term used to describe the degree of personal control we believe we have over our lives.
• For observational learning to occur, one must pay attention, retain what was learned, can reproduce the behavior, and finally, the motivation to learn.
• Reciprocal determinism states that internal factors, environment, and behavior intertwine to determine our behavior and traits.
• Bandura and a team of researchers conducted a study called the "Bobo Doll Experiment" to test the impact of observational learning in the absence of direct reinforcement.

What are the criticisms of the social cognitive perspective on personality?

Which among the following is a criticism of the social

Which of the following is a criticism of the trait theories of personality?

Which of the following is a criticism of the humanistic perspectives on personality?