Is a psychological state that refers to the positive expectations of the intent or behavior of the other person in situations involving risk?

13.

Research on trust is multifaceted and is present in many different realms of research. With respect to electronic government, trust has got distinct dimensions. Most importantly, trust in information and communication technology and trust in the government itself are crucial. Learn more in: E-Government: Status Quo and Future Trends

19.

Assurance, certainty, certitude, confidence, conviction, credence, credit, dependence, expectation, faith, hope, positiveness, reliance, sureness liability, obligation, protection, safekeeping necessary for all relationships. Learn more in: Parallels of the Nurse-Patient, Facilitator-Learner Trust Relationships as they Affect the National Economy

25.

the result of the assessment that one party makes of the credibility and goodwill of the other party of a relationship. It is formed by three different dimensions: honesty, benevolence and competence. Learn more in: Trust in Virtual Communities

33.

The level of willingness of the trustor to be vulnerable to the actions of the trustee based on the expectation that the trustee will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the trustor’s ability to monitor or control the trustee. Learn more in: The Impact of Communications Technology on Trust

35.

An interpersonal relation, where one of the people involved expects the other to behave in a certain way, while the other has the freedom to act (or not) according to the expectation. Learn more in: Embedded in a Culture

54.

Trust is a particular level of one’s subjective probability that another’s action would be favorable to oneself from the psychological viewpoint (Gambetta, 1988),. Gambetta states that “trust (or symmetrically distrust) is a particular level of subjective probability with which an agent will perform a particular action, both before the trustor can monitor such action (or independently of his capacity of ever to be able to monitor it) and in a context in which it affects its own action” (p.217). Learn more in: The Sense of Security and Trust

57.

Trust ‘is a subjective assessment of another’s influence in terms of the extent of one’s perceptions about the quality and significance of another’s impact over one’s outcomes in a given situation, such that one’s expectation of, openness to, and inclination toward such influence provide a sense of control over the potential outcomes of the situation’ (Romano, 2003). Learn more in: Survivability of Sensors with Key and Trust Management

59.

The attitude of an agent to delegate a part of its own plan/goal to another agent and rely upon it in a risky situation (possible failure) on the basis of its own beliefs about the other agent and on the environment in which it operates. Learn more in: Socio-Cognitive Model of Trust

65.

Can be viewed as a cognitive and social device able to reduce complexity, enabling people to cope with the different levels of uncertainty and sometimes the risks that, at different degrees, permeate our life. Without trust, an individual would freeze in uncertainty and indecision when faced with the impossibility of calculating all possible outcomes of a situation. From a social perspective, trust permits the necessary knowledge sharing of delegation and cooperative actions (Luhmann, 1979). Learn more in: Building and Management of Trust in Networked Information Systems

74.

A complex belief and a relatively stable feeling presuming honesty and reliability of interactions with a partner--a person or an institution. According to various authors, trust involves many components such as a feeling for security, reliability, personal relationship, and others (see e.g., Clases et al., 2003). Grabner-Kraeuter (2002) sees trust as a mechanism to reduce the complexity of human conduct in situations where people have to cope with uncertainty. It bears important functions for the consumer- it reduces information complexity and lowers the perceived risk of transaction. Learn more in: Perception of VO Reliability

80.

“The willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that other party.” (Mayer and van der Hoek, 1995) Learn more in: Investing Trust Relationships in a Healthcare Network

82.

in the Web environment is most often defined as a belief or expectation about the website, the web vendor and/or the Internet as the trusted party or object of trust or as a behavioural intention or willingness to depend or rely on the trusted party (Grabner-Kräuter and Kaluscha, 2003). In the context of OSNs other network participants, the social network site and the Web 2.0 technology can be considered as objects of trust (Grabner-Kräuter, 2010). Trust in the OSN captures both characteristics of an organization (the network provider) and a technology (the Internet serving as a transmission medium for online activities, or more specifically the security services and technical solutions embedded in Web 2.0 technologies). Learn more in: Role of Privacy and Trust in Mobile Business Social Networks

87.

Trust refers to reliability on some person or some system. In computer science, any system is said to be trusted when it behaves the way the user expects it to do. It can be defined as the success rate of any computing system. Mathematically, trust is a probabilistic value which lies between 0 and 1. Trust is a complex concept which has no universally accepted scholarly definition. Evidence from a contemporary, cross-disciplinary collection of scholarly writing suggests that a widely held definition of trust is as follows: “Trust is a psychological state comprising the intention to accept vulnerability based upon positive expectations of the intentions or behaviour of another.” Trust is a broader notion than security as it includes subjective criteria and experience. Correspondingly, there exist both hard (security-oriented) and soft trust (i. e. non-security oriented trust) solutions. “Hard” trust involves aspects like authenticity, encryption, and security in transactions. The “soft” trust involves human psychology, brand loyalty, and userfriendliness. Some soft issues are involved in security, nevertheless. When trust is related to cloud computing, it is classified as persistent and dynamic trust to distinguish between social and technological means. Persistent trust referes to trust involving long-term underlying properties or infrastructure and this arises through relatively static social and technological mechanisms. Dynamic trust refers to trust specific to certain states, contexts, or short-term or variable information; this can arise through context-based social and technological mechanisms. Persistent social-based trust in a hardware or software component or system is an expression of confidence in technological-based trust, because it is assurance about implementation and operation of that component or system. In particular, there are links between social-based trust and technological-based trust through the vouching mechanism, because it is important to know who is vouching for something as well as what they are vouching; hence social-based trust should always be considered. Learn more in: Trusted Cloud- and Femtocell-Based Biometric Authentication for Mobile Networks

105.

A subjective probability of a one peer (trustee) so that particular actions of another peer (trusted) they are willing and capable to perform will be done according to trustee’s expectations in the given context and time Learn more in: Secure Routing with Reputation in MANET

112.

A psychological state that rests upon expectations and beliefs of one party that another party will act in a certain manner, given that the trusting party is in some way vulnerable under conditions of risk and interdependency to actions by the other party. Learn more in: Governance Mechanisms for E-Collaboration

113.

Willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party, based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that other party. Learn more in: Training to Improve Trust in Virtual Teams

114.

The willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other party will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that other party Learn more in: Designing for Trust

118.

The word “trust” has several meanings (section 3); the ones relevant to this chapter are the belief in the honesty and reliability of, or confidence in, some other party. For example, Alice feels confident lending Bob her car because she trusts that he will return it and she has confidence he will drive well. See also Learn more in: Security and Trust in a Global Research Infrastructure

123.

Willingness to rely on another party, an accepted vulnerability under risk conditions. As a component of SC, it plays the crucial role in fostering knowledge and resource sharing. It compensates risk and its perception in the situation of mediated communication. Learn more in: Contributions of Social Capital Theory to HRM

124.

firm reliance on the integrity, ability, or character of a person or thing. In e-commerce, trust is the expectation that arises within a community based on commonly sharing norms from one member to another of that community. More generally, trust indicates a positive belief or expectation about the perceived reliability of, dependability of and confidence in a person, an intelligent agent, organization, company, object, process, or system (Schneiderman, 2000). Learn more in: Engineering of Experience Based Trust for E-Commerce

128.

The term trust in this work is defined as a “social institution that enables the involved parties to reduce the complexities of their relationship”. Thereby trust consists of two components: trusting behaviour and trusting expectation. In general, trusting behaviour stands for actions, which lead to increased vulnerability of oneself to another; whose behaviour is not under one’s control. This trust must be instilled despite the possible detriment one might receive if the other abuses that vulnerability. This risk may outweigh the possible benefits if the partner behaves in a non-opportunistic way (Zand, 1972, p. 230). In our economical context the trusting action represents the voluntary delivery of risky advance performances by the provider, without gaining full information about the business partner and abstaining from explicit contractual security and controlling measures. Trusting expectation means that the party receiving this trust is expected to act in an honest way. In other words, the party providing the advance performances expects its contracting party to not exhibit opportunistic behaviour (Ripperger, 1998, p. 60). Learn more in: Cultural Differences in Managing Cloud Computing Service Level Agreements

131.

Trust can be viewed as a cognitive and social device able to reduce complexity, enabling people to cope with the different levels of uncertainty and sometimes the risks that, at different degrees, permeate our life. Without trust an individual would freeze in uncertainty and indecision when faced with the impossibility of calculate all possible outcomes of a situation. From a social perspective trust permits the necessary knowledge sharing of delegation and cooperative actions (Luhman, 1979). Learn more in: Surveying Trust in Virtual Organizations

134.

A relationship of reliance. Trust is a prediction of reliance on an action, based on what a node knows about the other node, in the context of wireless sensor networks. The notion of trust is increasingly adopted to predict acceptance of behaviors by others. Learn more in: Routing Security in Wireless Sensor Networks

149.

In the Web environment is most often defined as a belief or expectation about the website, the web vendor and/or the Internet as the trusted party or object of trust or as a behavioral intention or willingness to depend or rely on the trusted party ( Grabner-Kräuter & Kaluscha, 2003 ). In the context of OSNs other network participants, the social network site and the Web 2.0 technology can be considered as objects of trust (Grabner-Kräuter 2010 AU183: The in-text citation "Grabner-Kräuter 2010" is not in the reference list. Please correct the citation, add the reference to the list, or delete the citation. ). Trust in the OSN captures both characteristics of an organization (the network provider) and a technology (the Internet serving as a transmission medium for online activities, or more specifically the security services and technical solutions embedded in Web 2.0 technologies). Learn more in: Privacy, Trust, and Business Ethics for Mobile Business Social Networks

151.

A prerequisite for knowledge sharing to take place. Trust can be categorized as one of two types, integrity and ability based, and is about the willingness to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectations that they will deliver something important or of value. Learn more in: Strengthening an Organizational Knowledge-Sharing Culture

152.

Assurance, certainty, certitude, confidence, conviction, credence, credit, dependence, expectation, faith, hope, positiveness, reliance, sureness liability, obligation, protection, safekeeping necessary for all relationships. Learn more in: The Visualization of a Critical Element in K-20 Learning: Trust from the Learner’s Perspective

155.

The willingness of one person or group to relate to another in the belief that the other’s actions will be beneficial rather than detrimental, even though this cannot be guaranteed ( Child, 2001 ). Trust definitions share three common elements ( Hosmer, 1995 ): a degree of interdependence between trustor and trustee; trust provides a way to cope with risk or uncertainty in exchange relationships; and the belief or expectation that the vulnerability resulting from the acceptance of risk will not be taken advantage of by the other party in the relationship. Learn more in: Trust Multidimensionality

158.

The lack of physical interaction places a higher regard on the trust that exists between each entity involved in the organization. Since fewer “checks and balances” can be placed on appropriate departments, management and other entities trust that they will complete the appropriate work on time or be straightforward about delays or problems. If two entities working on a project together separated by thousands of miles are unwilling to trust each other, the work slows and suffers to a critical point. Learn more in: Virtual Organization

161.

“The willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that other party.” (Mayer and van der Hoek, 1995) Learn more in: Investing Trust Relationships in a Healthcare Network

Which of the following determines how your behavioral intentions translate into actions?

What term refers to the necessary stress that activates and motivates people to achieve goals and change their environments?

Why do emotions have a greater influence on our perceptions attitudes decisions and behavior than cognition?

Which of the following is the highest level of emotional intelligence?