In what time will ₹ 6000 amount to ₹ 6615 at 5% per annum compounded annually?

Hint: The problem can be solved easily with the concept of compound interest. Compound interest is the interest calculated on the principal and the interest of the previous period. The amount in compound interest to be cumulated depends on the initial principal amount, rate of interest and number of time periods elapsed. The amount A after a certain number of time periods T on a given principal amount P at a specified rate R compounded annually is calculated by the formula: $A = P{\left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right)^T}$ .

Complete step-by-step answer:
In the given problem,
Principal $ = P = Rs\,6,000$
Rate of interest $ = R\% $
Time Duration $ = 2\,years$
In the question, the period after which the compound interest is compounded or evaluated is given as a year.
So, Number of time periods $ = n = 2$
Now, The amount A to be paid after a certain number of time periods n on a given principal amount P at a specified rate R compounded annually is calculated by the formula: $A = P{(1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}})^T}$ .
Hence, Amount $ = P{\left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right)^T}$
Substituting the values of known quantities, we get,
$ \Rightarrow 6615 = 6000{\left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right)^2}$
Shifting the terms in the equation, we get,
$ \Rightarrow {\left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right)^2} = \dfrac{{6615}}{{6000}}$
Cancelling common factors in numerator and denominator, we get,
 $ \Rightarrow {\left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right)^2} = \dfrac{{441}}{{400}}$
Taking square root on both sides of equation, we get,
$ \Rightarrow \left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right) = \sqrt {\dfrac{{441}}{{400}}} $
We know that square roots of $441$ and $400$ are $21$ and $20$ respectively. So, we get,
$ \Rightarrow \left( {1 + \dfrac{R}{{100}}} \right) = \dfrac{{21}}{{20}}$
Isolating the variable R. we get,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{R}{{100}} = \dfrac{{21}}{{20}} - 1$
Taking LCM of fractions,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{R}{{100}} = \dfrac{{21 - 20}}{{20}}$
Multiplying both sides of equation by $100$,
$ \Rightarrow R = \dfrac{1}{{20}} \times 100$
Simplifying the calculations, we get,
$ \Rightarrow R = 5$
So, the rate of interest per annum for which $Rs\,6000$ amounts to $Rs\,6615$ in two years is $5\% $.
So, the correct answer is “ $5\% $”.

Note: Time duration is not always equal to the number of time periods. The equality holds only when the compound interest is compounded annually. If the compound interest is compounded half yearly, then the number of time periods doubles in the given time duration and the rate of interest in each time period becomes half of the specified rate of interest. Care should be taken while doing calculations.

Microsoft and Sony are both battling behind the scenes over the Activision Blizzard deal, and Microsoft is no longer pulling its punches with regulators

By Tom Warren / @tomwarren

Oct 12, 2022, 6:23 PM UTC|

Share this story

In what time will ₹ 6000 amount to ₹ 6615 at 5% per annum compounded annually?

Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge

Microsoft isn’t happy with Sony and the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority. The UK regulator signaled an in-depth review of Microsoft’s $68.7 billion deal to acquire Activision Blizzard last month, and the CMA has now published its full 76-page report (PDF) on its findings. The CMA says it has concerns that Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal could lessen competition in game consoles, subscriptions, and cloud gaming, but Microsoft thinks the regulator has simply been listening to Sony’s lawyers too much.

Microsoft pleaded for its deal on the day of the Phase 2 decision last month, but now the gloves are well and truly off. Microsoft describes the CMA’s concerns as “misplaced” and says that the regulator “adopts Sony’s complaints without considering the potential harm to consumers” and “incorrectly relies on self-serving statements by Sony which significantly exaggerate the importance of Call of Duty.” Microsoft even accuses the CMA of adopting “Sony’s complaints without the appropriate level of critical review,” suggesting that the regulator is simply just listening too much to what Sony has to say.

At the heart of all the back and forth is access to Call of Duty and concerns around the future of game subscriptions. “The CMA recognizes that ABK’s newest games are not currently available on any subscription service on the day of release but considers that this may change as subscription services continue to grow,” says the UK regulator. “After the Merger, Microsoft would gain control of this important input and could use it to harm the competitiveness of its rivals.”

Microsoft’s full response to the CMA, seen by The Verge, also includes parts where the company tries to, comically, make it look like it somehow sucks at gaming and it can’t compete. Microsoft says Xbox “is in last place in console” and “seventh place in PC” and “nowhere in mobile game distribution globally,” and Microsoft argues it has no reason to harm or degrade rival cloud gaming services as it wants to “encourage the major shift in consumer behavior required for cloud gaming to succeed.”

Microsoft might well be in last place in console sales during the previous generation, but it’s certainly investing billions of dollars to ensure any future Xbox sales aren’t less than half of the PlayStation and that its Xbox Game Pass bet pays off.

Sony and Microsoft have also been battling it out over Call of Duty, and the CMA recognizes this by revealing it’s concerned about Sony’s future revenues related to Call of Duty. “PlayStation currently has a larger share of the console gaming market than Xbox, but the CMA considers that Call of Duty is sufficiently important that losing access to it (or losing access on competitive terms) could significantly impact Sony’s revenues and user base.”

In what time will ₹ 6000 amount to ₹ 6615 at 5% per annum compounded annually?

Call of Duty is at the center of Sony and Microsoft’s battles.Image: Activision

Sony has shown how significant Call of Duty is after it labeled Microsoft’s offer to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation “inadequate on many levels.” The Verge revealed last month that Microsoft Gaming CEO and Xbox chief Phil Spencer made a written commitment to PlayStation head Jim Ryan earlier this year to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for “several more years” beyond the existing marketing deal Sony has with Activision. “After almost 20 years of Call of Duty on PlayStation, their proposal was inadequate on many levels and failed to take account of the impact on our gamers,” said PlayStation head Jim Ryan in response.

Now Microsoft says keeping Call of Duty on PlayStation is a “commercial imperative for the Xbox business and the economics of the transaction.” Microsoft says it would put revenue at risk if it pulled Call of Duty from PlayStation and that “Microsoft has been clear that it is counting on revenues from the distribution of Activision Blizzard games on Sony PlayStation.”

Microsoft also accuses Sony of not welcoming competition from Xbox Game Pass and that Sony has decided to block Game Pass on PlayStation. “This increased competition has not been welcomed by the market leader Sony, which has elected to protect its revenues from sales of newly released games, rather than offer gamers the choice of accessing them via its subscription, PlayStation Plus.” This comes just months after Microsoft claimed, in legal filings, that Sony pays for “blocking rights” to keep games off Xbox Game Pass.

If the UK battles are anything to go by, this acquisition could get messy as Microsoft and Sony battle it out behind the scenes to sway regulators. Microsoft even has a dedicated website to highlight its arguments as it seeks to convince regulators that its giant deal isn’t a bad one for gamers. We’re still months away from final regulator decisions, but get ready for this battle to continue to spill out onto the internet’s streets.

Join the conversation

Most Popular

  1. Microsoft’s making Excel’s formulas even easier


  2. The predatory prison phone call industry is finally about to be fixed


  3. Southwest cancels thousands of flights, leaving passengers stranded across the US


  4. Microsoft Edge is actually good


  5. TikTok is now banned on mobile devices issued by US House of Representatives


Verge Deals

/ Sign up for Verge Deals to get deals on products we've tested sent to your inbox daily.

Email (required)Sign up

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

What will be the interest on Rupees 6000 at the rate of 5% per annum for 3 years compounded annually?

=A−P=Rs6,945. 75=Rs6,000=Rs945. 75.

What is the amount of rupees 6000 at the rate of 5% per annum for 2 years when interest is compounded annually?

∴ Amount = Rs.6000 × 110.25% = Rs.6615 The UPTET exam was conducted on 23rd January 2022.

At what rate percent per annum will Rs 6000 amount to Rs 6615 in 2 years when interest is compounded annually?

⇒ R = 5 % p.a.

At what time will ₹ 6000 amount to ₹ 7986 at 10% p a compounded annually?

Answer: After 3 years the principal of 6000 amount to 7986.