Some say" Philosophy bakes no bread." meaning that Philosophy has no practical relevance or value to the actual affairs of this world. It could be said in response to this critique that were it not for Philosophy little bread would be baked, for bakers need reasons, motives, purposes in their lives. If survival is the only end or purpose then little is accounted for in the history of the human species. We as human beings seem compelled to ask the question "survival for what?" If there are other ends it is in philosophic inquiry that they are distinctly discerned criticized and related to human affairs. Purposes, values may be presented in numerous ways (religion, and art are the best known) but they are understood philosophically. Philosophy seeks after clear enunciation of purpose and values and precise formulation without which human beings encounter a void, feel lost-without purpose or meaning, without a sense of place, without a relation to the rest of the universe. Show 1. Why do you need an operational definition when you already have a perfectly good conceptual definition?
2. Why can't you skip the conceptual definition and use only an operational definition to define your concept? i.e. why is it also necessary to have a conceptual definition?
3. What is the difference between conceptual and operational definitions?
4. A professor is studying learning and academic performance and uses GPA as a measure of how much her students have learned. Discuss why (or why not) this is an adequate operational definition of learning.
5. What role should essential qualities play in operational definitions?
6. What is the difference between a numeral and a number?
7. What is the difference between a number and an ordinal?
8. In what way is ratio scaling "stronger" than interval or ordinal scaling?
|