Show Article MenuOpen AccessReview by 1,2,*,
1,
1,
2,3,
2,4,
5,6,
5,7 and
2,5,8 1 Alentejo Coastal Hospital (HLA), Alentejo Coastal Local Health Unit (ULSLA), 7540-230 Santiago do Cacém, Portugal 2 Nursing
Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), 1900-160 Lisbon, Portugal 3 Beatriz Angelo Hospital, 2674-514 Loures, Portugal 4 Nursing School of Lisbon, 1900-160 Lisbon, Portugal 5 Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), 7000-811 Évora, Portugal 6 Nursing Department, University of Évora, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal 7 Polytechnic Institute of Beja, 7800-111 Beja, Portugal 8 Escola Superior de Saúde Atlântica, 2730-036 Lisbon, Portugal * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Academic Editors: Afsane Riazi and José Carmelo Adsuar Sala Received: 9 February 2022 / Revised: 2 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 19 April 2022 Abstract(1) Background: The prevalence of coxarthrosis associated with ageing is one of the main reasons for the increase in hip arthroplasty. Educational intervention in the pre- and postoperative period of hip arthroplasty can improve functionality and, consequently, quality of life. Therefore, we intend to map the educational interventions that improve the functional capacity of people undergoing hip arthroplasty on their rehabilitation process. (2) Methods: Scoping review. The search was carried out in the databases: CINAHL complete, MEDLINE Complete, Nursing and Allied Health Collection: Comprehensive, Cochrane Methodology Register, Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts, MedcLatina, and Google Academic. We included studies that evaluated the implementation of educational rehabilitation interventions that enable the empowerment and teaching of people undergoing hip arthroplasty. (3) Results: Thirteen studies were analysed that met the eligibility criteria and allowed the research question to be answered. Education in the perioperative period promotes training to perform rehabilitation exercises, improves the hospitalisation experience, increases participation in the rehabilitation process, allows early mobilisation, and increases the functional potential, thus enabling faster reintegration into society. (4) Conclusion: Early mobilisation plays a very important role in a person′s functional recovery, as well as in the prevention of thromboembolic complications. Exercise produces benefits in relation to physical function, namely, in improving strength, balance, facilitating functional activities, and preventing complications. The ageing process, with its numerous anatomical and physiological changes, contributes to the increased prevalence of chronic diseases and the consequent increase of people in a
situation of dependency [1,2]. These physiological changes manifest themselves with balance deficits; postural control maintenance; muscle atrophy; weakness; and changes in cognitive functions such as memory, learning, and awareness, with contributions to the increased risk of falling and the decreased ability to perform
activities of daily living (ADLs) [1]. With aging, joints suffer progressive wear and tear of the cartilage and structures involved, with osteoarthritis being the leading cause of functional disability and the hip joint being one of the most affected
[1,2]. These factors, together with an increase in average life expectancy, mean that a large part of the elderly population suffers from pain and limited functional capacity to perform ADLs [2]. In addition, we must also consider the loss of
bone and muscle mass, which leads to a greater predisposition to falls and consequently fractures, with the most frequent ones occurring in the upper extremity of the femur, namely, in its neck and trochanteric region. This increases considerably after the age of 60, with a maximum incidence between the ages of 70 and 79 [3]. These phenomena have a great impact on the elderly population, contributing to a
significant increase in morbidity and mortality, as well as to an increase in the likelihood of long-term institutionalisation due to dependence, which implies high social and economic burdens [3]. Hip arthroplasty emerges as a solution when there is no improvement of the symptoms with conservative treatment. This surgical procedure is widely used with great success in the treatment of joint disease,
whether degenerative, inflammatory, or traumatic, promoting pain reduction, recovery of limb function, reduced disability, and improvement of life quality [4]. A structured intervention programme developed by rehabilitation nurses, with the aim of empowering people to achieve the greatest possible autonomy and independence in self-care, plays a key role, as the need for functional recovery after surgery
is extremely important, both in terms of restoring functional capacity and returning to social and professional life [5]. In the preoperative period, the intervention of the rehabilitation nurse should focus on education as a strategy to prevent complications, providing information about the surgical procedure and rehabilitation exercises with the goal of promoting functional adaptation to ADLs. Respiratory
functional re-education should also be addressed, with the aim of preventing respiratory complications [3]. Within the scope of functional motor re-education, the following should be addressed: positioning in bed; isometric contractions of abdominal, gluteal, and quadricep muscle groups; lumbopelvic extension or half-bridge; getting up and lying down in bed; sitting down and getting up from a chair; using
the shower/bath; using the toilet; walking with a Zimmer frame or crutches up and down the stairs; getting in and out of the car; mobilisation of the tibiotarsal joint to facilitate venous return and prevent complications such as thrombophlebitis; and also the movements to be avoided in order to prevent dislocations [3,6]. Various studies have shown that health education interventions contribute towards an increase in the satisfaction of the person and their family, as well as decreasing the administration of painkillers, reducing the risk of dislocation, helping with rehabilitation, and facilitating functional activity. According to some authors, these interventions can improve self-efficacy to regain health and facilitate rehabilitation after surgery
[7,8,9]. One study, which compared a standardised care approach to the person-centred care for patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery, concluded that 3 months after surgery, 88% of patients in the control group had regained their
independence versus 92.5% in the person-centred care group [9]. This emphasises the importance of focusing our attention on people and their families, making them partners in the decision-making process about the care to be provided
[8,9], as co-responsibility increases adherence to the rehabilitation programme [8]. The first step towards this is information and communication strategies adjusted to the literacy level of the person and their family
[8,9]. This review aims to present the educational interventions that improve the functional capacity of people undergoing hip arthroplasty on their rehabilitation process. Considering the defined objective and given the heterogeneity of the studies interventions, we chose to conduct a scoping review, as it is a comprehensive form of research used to address broad topics, focusing on in-depth results based on the available evidence
[10,11,12], which allow us to chart the educational interventions developed in the rehabilitation of people who have undergone hip arthroplasty, as well as their outcomes. On the other hand, in addition to identifying, this method allows us to examine and systematise a concept or its characteristics by allowing the identification of the nature of a broad field of knowledge [10]. A protocol (OSF Registration: osf.io/7362b) was followed to answer the research question: “What are the rehabilitation interventions performed to empower and enable the person undergoing hip arthroplasty to improve functional capacity?”, with 6 steps: (1) Identification of the review question using the acronym PCC as a starting point; (2) Designation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of studies and identification of the relevant ones; (3) Selection of the studies; (4) Assessment of the level of evidence of the collected literature, according to JBI guidelines; (5) Discussion of the results; and (6) Synthesis and presentation of the results obtained [13]. 2.2. Elegibility CriteriaAs inclusion criteria of the review, the following were established:
Studies exploring educational programmes in people with various types of arthroplasty were accepted, provided that they allowed the extraction of data concerning the sample of people with hip arthroplasty. Systematic reviews and quantitative primary studies were included. The exclusion criteria considered were articles with children and teenagers, unrelated to the topic under study, with ambiguous methodology and repeated in both databases. 2.3. Data CollectionThe search descriptors were: “hip arthroplasty”, “Nursing care”, “Rehabilitation”, “Patient education”, and “mobilization” validated in MeSH and DeCS. The Booleans, “OR” and “AND” were used as well as the expander apply to equivalent subjects. The search was performed on the EBSCOhost platforms (MEDLINE, CINAHL; Cochrane; MedicLatina) and Google Academic, during the month of April 2021, for studies in Portuguese, English, French, and Spanish (Table 1). Study selection involved title evaluation and abstract analysis in order to identify whether the articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed the inclusion of studies by reading the titles, abstracts, and keywords, excluding those that did not meet the inclusion criteria for this review. Subsequently, the same reviewers independently assessed the full texts. In cases of discrepancies in the decision, a third reviewer was used. The articles were also assessed by two independent reviewers for the level of evidence before inclusion in the review. A third reviewer was also included in divergent and doubtful cases. 2.4. Data Processing and AnalysisIn the data extraction phase, a descriptive analysis of each study was performed using an extraction instrument designed to extricate the information according to the research question. The isolated data had specific details about the study objective, study design, assessment instruments, participants, interventions, and main findings. Data extraction was carried out by two reviewers independently, and doubts and disparities were resolved with the inclusion of other two reviewers. In the data extraction phase, the content of the articles was thoroughly analysed, which allowed not only for the answering of the research question, but also for the observation of the contribution of educational interventions in the rehabilitation programmes of patients who had undergone hip arthroplasty, with regards to pain control, reduction of complications, hospitalisations, readmissions, and recovery time. 3. ResultsIn the EBSCO Host database, 546 studies were identified. After removal of the duplicated results, only 462 were left for analysis. Of these 462 studies that were identified, 416 were excluded by evaluating the title, leaving 46 for further reading. After reading the abstract, a further 25 studies were excluded as they did not answer the research question. The full-text versions of the remaining 21 articles were read, and seven articles met the inclusion criteria. In Google academic, 140 studies were identified, and after the analysis of the titles, only 10 were left for further analysis. After the full reading of the studies, six were selected to be part of this review; so, in total, 13 studies were included. The selection process is presented through the PRISMA-ScR flowchart with the results in the different phases. The identification and selection of studies for inclusion are presented in Figure 1. The 13 studies included in the present scoping review were published between 2003 and 2021, with one of the articles published in 2003 [14], one in 2005 [7], one in 2008 [15], two in 2011 [16,17], one in 2012 [18], one in 2018 [19], one in 2019 [20], and five in 2020 [21,22,23,24,25]. Eleven articles are in English, although with various countries of origin, such as Canada [17], Sweden [14], Taiwan [7], Germany [16], Italy [19], the United Kingdom [18], China [21,23], Thailand [20], Denmark [22], the United States of America [24], and Portugal [25]. The French article originated in France [15], and the Portuguese article originated in Portugal [25] (Table 2). Of these articles, 11 are primary sources: cohort study [16,17,20], quasi-experimental study [7,18,19], randomised controlled study [21,22,23,24]; two are systematic reviews [14,15]; and one is a quantitative descriptive study [25]. The number of participants ranged from 12 [19] to 242, divided into control group (124) and experimental group (118) [24]. The main interventions were carried out at the level of preoperative education through visualisation of leaflets, videos, and CDs; an effective postoperative analgesia; and early mobilisation. This includes isometric and isotonic mobilisations of the lower limbs, transfers to bed and chair, and gait training with gait assistants. Preoperative education contributes to the satisfaction of the patients with the nursing care provided and reduces anxiety of the unknown, since all the patient’s doubts are clarified, preparing them for surgery and rehabilitation. Early mobilisation is beneficial in terms of functional mobility, contributing to the reduction of hospital length of stay and the incidence of postoperative complications, while promoting an improvement in the quality of life of hip arthroplasty patients and facilitating their reintegration into the family and society. After assessing the levels of evidence (Table 2), the results were analysed. The extracted data included specific details on the study objective, study design, assessment tools, participants, interventions, and main conclusions (Table 3). The analysis of the studies in the literature sample showed that educational interventions are maintained throughout the perioperative period, focusing on information about the surgery and changes in self-care and the teaching of early mobilisation, transfer, gait, and safe ADL training to avoid luxating movements. Some programmes also assist in managing peri-operative expectations and hospitalisation to make the experience less traumatic. 4. DiscussionThe 13 studies included in this scoping review allowed us to chart the educational interventions that have the potential to improve the functional capacity of people undergoing hip arthroplasty on their rehabilitation process. In addition, it was possible to identify secondary beneficial outcomes such as improvement of pain control; reduction of complications; and decreased hospital stay, readmissions and recovery time. A preoperative rehabilitation programme that includes a home visit allows for a correct identification on the required support devices, adaptive equipment, and the person’s perception of their abilities. It makes the educational intervention more effective and allows for the ADL training to be performed as close to reality as possible [25]. It is through nursing interactions, such as teaching and guidance, that there is an increase in the person’s knowledge and empowerment, teaching them to make decisions. Learning skills allows the development of effective strategies in the recovery of stability and wellbeing, permitting the maximisation of autonomy and facilitating the performance of basic and instrumental activities of daily living. By doing so, there is an improvement in the participation in society and in people’s quality of life [27]. Educational interventions were carried out in sessions and the themes usually approached were the surgery, the risks and complications, breathing exercises before surgery, isometric exercises of the quadriceps, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the ankle, postoperative care, thromboembolic prophylaxis, first standing up, gait training with the aid of devices, and care to prevent dislocation of the prosthesis [7,16,17,18,19,23,25]. These interventions can be reinforced with the support of paper instructions [7,17,20,22,25], viewing of videos and CDs [7,25], and monitoring of physical activity and pain by text messages [24], which contributes to better self-efficacy and increased functional capacity. Monitoring has a more significant effect on reducing the readmission rate by providing a direct mean of communication with the health professional to clarify doubts and assess urgent problems [24]. Other studies argue that eHealth programmes that support individualised education of the person in preoperative preparation, inpatient care, and home rehabilitation have the advantage of potentially increasing the person’s involvement, improving their recovery, and reducing potential postoperative complications [28,29], contributing to positive clinical outcomes, when compared to conventional face-to-face rehabilitation approaches. These are low-cost interventions suited to their specific needs and with low levels of disruption in their daily life, which could justify the implementation of telerehabilitation in clinical settings, not only in the current COVID-19 context but also in post-surgery follow-ups [30]; in addition, these interventions have very significant effects on reducing hospitalisation time, without altering the rates of complications and readmissions [31]. The articles in the literature sample indicate that educational interventions may also help with pain control [16,18,23], which corroborates the results of other studies that confirm an approach focused on educational interventions, patient-centred care, and their fears and anxieties contribute to an effective pain control [8,9,32]. After surgery, effective pain control is one of the most important issues, and it is necessary to optimise pain control, whether through preoperative analgesia as a preventive measure [16,17,18,23], infiltration of local anaesthetic into the wound [18], intra-articular injection of local anaesthetic [16,17], or the use of self-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) [17]. All these alternatives had a significant influence on adequate pain control and the possibility of mobilisation on the day of surgery. Effective pain management and educational intervention performed by nurses may help early recovery after hip arthroplasty. Therefore, it is essential that nurses ensure that people receive high quality and effective education. The development of effective education interventions has been described as one of many ways to ensure quality nursing in the future [33]. Early mobilisation has been shown to be effective in restoring function and mobilisation, relieving pain, and speeding gait recovery, which, whenever possible, should be initiated during the first four hours after surgery [16,17,18]. Another measure to promote early mobilisation and standing up is the preference of administration of tranexamic acid [16] over the placement of drains [16,18] as a measure to reduce blood loss. This option favours early mobilisation and standing up. A preoperative functional exercise plan improves the person’s ability to adjust to the surgery, and postoperative functional exercises promotes the rehabilitation of limb function, whilst significantly reducing hospitalisation time and the incidence of postoperative complications, as well as improving the people′s quality of life [15,19,21]. The educational intervention on physical exercise should be tailored to on the needs and expectations of people undergoing total hip arthroplasty as this shows benefits in reducing levels of pain and improving activities of daily living [34]. Preoperative resistance training has not shown additional benefit regarding muscle strength, but it is a viable complement to achieve the earliest onset of postoperative functional recovery, as it has been shown to accelerate rehabilitation by three months [22]. The implementation of rapid recovery programmes after hip arthroplasty can be very beneficial for the person in terms of pain control and recovery of mobility, as well as in reducing the length of hospital stay, which brings benefits in terms of hospital costs [14,16,17,18,23]. Several studies have shown that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) reduces the need for prolonged hospital stays, the reintervention rate, and the readmission rate, with consequent savings in hospital costs [35,36]. These types of programmes, based on interventions to reduce psychological trauma and postoperative stress, accelerate the recovery process and contribute significantly to increasing patient satisfaction, in addition to the aforementioned effects [35,37]. Given the type of studies included in this study are more of a quantitative paradigm, we believe it is important to conduct further qualitative research to understand not only people’s satisfaction with the programmes, but also to assess which interventions and educational strategies are better suited to the literacy of this population, as that will allow for better clinical decision making using the person’s preferences, experience, clinical context, and resources [38]. The above is in line with the consensus guidelines on the subject: preoperative education and counselling is strongly recommended as it reduces anxiety; physiological optimising the person in pre-admission, by decreasing existing preoperative risk factors, such as smoking, alcohol, anaemia, nutritional and metabolic status, and low physical activity, is also strongly recommended as it contributes to the reduction of complications and consequently the reduction of hospitalisation days; the prevention of perioperative blood loss through the use of tranexamic acid is strongly recommended, thus reducing the need for blood transfusions; the use of effective postoperative analgesia; the maintenance of normothermia during the intraoperative period; the use of antimicrobial and antithrombotic prophylaxis; early mobilisation, where people should be mobilised as early as possible in order to prevent risks associated with immobilisation and criteria-based discharge. The requirements for discharge from the hospital include the ability to dress independently, to get in and out of bed, to sit up and get out of a chair or toilet, and the ability to independently care for their personal hygiene and mobilise with a walking aid [39]. A home rehabilitation programme is considered safe and effective in improving the physical performance and quality of life of people who have undergone hip arthroplasty [20]. Early mobilisation is the gold standard for recovering functional mobility, as exercises can produce long-term benefits in relation to physical function, namely, improving strength and balance, facilitating the performance of functional activities, and preventing adverse outcomes such as falls. Postoperative rehabilitation programmes in the community consist of functional re-establishment and the use of educational approaches, allowing gains in functionality greater than conventional rehabilitation strategies [40]. The transition from hospital care to outpatient care or home settings requires significant paradigm changes, which is not widely used and is mainly implemented in outpatient surgery centres or specialised orthopaedic hospitals, despite the reduction of complications and readmissions [41], with high levels of satisfaction for the person and the caregiver, as it allows for the clarification of the process and expectations [8,42]. There is evidence of individualised transition care programmes implemented and led by nurses that show gains in functionality in the postoperative period of hip arthroplasty [43]. The transition from hospital to home should be made safely, with the certainty that the person and their family will receive the necessary support according to their needs. The nurse’s role is important in defining appropriate interventions to ensure continuity of care between hospital and home, minimising side effects and secondary disabilities caused by the surgery whilst promoting the knowledge and capacities of the person and their family in adapting to their new reality. The nurse has the responsibility to ensure that discharge occurs safely and people and their families feel properly prepared and supported [44,45], which highlights the need to involve the family in this preoperative process, enabling them to provide continuity of care, while promoting the independence of the person undergoing surgery. LimitationsOne limitation is related to the very design of a scoping review, as it aims to provide a view of the state of research in relation to the questions posed, and the quality of the included studies is not considered. Another limitation is the inclusion of studies only in Portuguese, French, Spanish, and English. 5. ConclusionsFrom the studies reviewed, we can determine that rehabilitation interventions play a key role in the functional recovery after hip arthroplasty. The empowerment of the person/family in relation to the process they will experience allows for a more positive vision, less stress, and greater participation. A programme that includes a preoperative assessment at the person’s home allows for the correct identification of the support devices required, the person’s perception of their abilities, and the characteristics of the home itself, so that the training of life activities can be carried out as close as possible to reality. The use of education strategies alone does not reduce pain, functioning, or hospitalisation time, so adequate pain management is essential, with effective administration of analgesics, so that the person can start mobilisation as early as possible. This early mobilisation plays a very important role in the person’s functional recovery, as well as in the prevention of thromboembolic complications. Exercise benefits physical function, improving strength and balance, assisting functional activities, and preventing complications. Teaching should combine verbal and written resources and images and should be exemplified whenever possible. The follow-up after discharge is very important, allowing for counselling and clarification of doubts and avoiding readmissions. In the current pandemic context, and with the technological resources that most people have access to, teleconsultation may be used as a strategy for follow-up in the postoperative period or even in the preoperative consultation. This topic should also be considered for further studies. In conclusion, all of these are vital aspects to be considered and implemented, as they allow patient empowerment, increasing their functional potential and facilitating their reintegration into society. Conceptualisation, C.N. and L.S.; methodology, C.N. and L.S.; validation, L.S., R.F. and C.L.B.; formal analysis, C.N., L.S. and C.L.B.; investigation, C.N., L.M., M.C. and B.F.; resources, C.N., L.M., M.C. and B.F.; data curation, C.N., C.L.B. and L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.N., B.F. and L.S.; writing—review and editing, C.N., C.L.B., C.F., R.F. and L.S.; supervision, L.S.; project
administration, L.S.; funding acquisition, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The present study was funded by the Center for Research, Innovation, and Development in Nursing, in Portugal, by means of grants provided to some of the authors (CIDNUR, Psafe2transition_2021). The present study was carried out according to the guidelines of the
best scientific practice for dissemination of research. Not applicable. Data are available only upon request to the authors. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Figure 1. PRISMA–ScR flowchart. Lisbon, 2020. Figure 1. PRISMA–ScR flowchart. Lisbon, 2020. Table 1. Syntaxes of combined descriptors in the scientific database search. Lisbon, 2020. Table 1. Syntaxes of combined descriptors in the scientific database search. Lisbon, 2020.
Table 2. Classification of included articles by level of evidence and country of origin. Lisbon, 2020. Table 2. Classification of included articles by level of evidence and country of origin. Lisbon, 2020.
Table 3. Data extraction. Lisbon, 2020. Table 3. Data extraction. Lisbon, 2020.
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |