Which of the following theories of prejudice asserts that people are categorized as somebodies or nobodies?

journal article

Journalism, Carnival, and Jubilate Agno

ELH

Vol. 59, No. 2 (Summer, 1992)

, pp. 357-384 (28 pages)

Published By: The Johns Hopkins University Press

//doi.org/10.2307/2873347

//www.jstor.org/stable/2873347

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$24.00 - Download now and later

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $24.00 USD.

Purchase this issue for $44.00 USD. Go to Table of Contents.

How does it work?

  1. Select a purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Journal Information

Since 1934 ELH has consistently published superior studies that interpret the conditions affecting major works in English and American literature. The importance of historical continuity in the discipline of letters remains a central concern for ELH, but the journal does not seek to sponsor particular methods or aims. Over the years, ELH has consistently maintained its high standards, publishing articles with an intelligent mix of historical, critical, and theoretical concerns.

Publisher Information

One of the largest publishers in the United States, the Johns Hopkins University Press combines traditional books and journals publishing units with cutting-edge service divisions that sustain diversity and independence among nonprofit, scholarly publishers, societies, and associations. Journals The Press is home to the largest journal publication program of any U.S.-based university press. The Journals Division publishes 85 journals in the arts and humanities, technology and medicine, higher education, history, political science, and library science. The division also manages membership services for more than 50 scholarly and professional associations and societies. Books With critically acclaimed titles in history, science, higher education, consumer health, humanities, classics, and public health, the Books Division publishes 150 new books each year and maintains a backlist in excess of 3,000 titles. With warehouses on three continents, worldwide sales representation, and a robust digital publishing program, the Books Division connects Hopkins authors to scholars, experts, and educational and research institutions around the world. Project MUSE® Project MUSE is a leading provider of digital humanities and social sciences content, providing access to journal and book content from nearly 300 publishers. MUSE delivers outstanding results to the scholarly community by maximizing revenues for publishers, providing value to libraries, and enabling access for scholars worldwide. Hopkins Fulfillment Services (HFS) HFS provides print and digital distribution for a distinguished list of university presses and nonprofit institutions. HFS clients enjoy state-of-the-art warehousing, real-time access to critical business data, accounts receivable management and collection, and unparalleled customer service.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
ELH © 1992 The Johns Hopkins University Press
Request Permissions

journal article

Demystifying a Change in Taste: Spices, Space, and Social Hierarchy in Europe, 1380-1750

The International History Review

Vol. 29, No. 2 (Jun., 2007)

, pp. 237-257 (21 pages)

Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

//www.jstor.org/stable/40110784

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Purchase article

$51.00 - Download now and later

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $51.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Journal Information

The International History Review is the only English-language quarterly devoted entirely to the history of international relations. An international journal on international history, the Review publishes articles, notes with documents, bibliographies, and reviews, on everything that affected, or was affected by, the relations between all states, throughout the world, throughout history. Diplomacy, trade, warfare, revolution, imperialism, cultures, social structures, mentalités, communications, and systems are some of the subjects studied from the ancient world to the Gulf Wars.

Publisher Information

Building on two centuries' experience, Taylor & Francis has grown rapidlyover the last two decades to become a leading international academic publisher.The Group publishes over 800 journals and over 1,800 new books each year, coveringa wide variety of subject areas and incorporating the journal imprints of Routledge,Carfax, Spon Press, Psychology Press, Martin Dunitz, and Taylor & Francis.Taylor & Francis is fully committed to the publication and dissemination of scholarly information of the highest quality, and today this remains the primary goal.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The International History Review © 2007 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Request Permissions

Which of the following statements best describes the difference between traditional healers?

1. Which best describes the difference between traditional healers as opposed to Western providers? B. Traditional healing is circular in nature.

Which of the following would be considered a pitfall in working with culturally diverse clients?

Which of the following would be considered a pitfall in working with culturally diverse clients? Focusing too heavily on differences.

Which of the following best describes the concept of race?

Which of the following best describes the concept of "race"? It is a social construction.

Which of the following stages of cultural competence do most agencies fall?

Under which of the following stages of the cultural competence continuum do most agencies fall? Cultural pre-competence.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte