What is defined as plurality of culture along various cultural dimensions or cultural locations?

Abstract

In plural societies, people of different cultures live together in a common geographic territory with a common social set up. Most societies in the world today are culturally diverse—some more than others—and it would be difficult to find a nation whose people have only one cultural background, a single language and a single identity. There are many factors behind the cultural plurality of the contemporary world such as the infl uence of globalisation, the destruction of traditional moral values, the liberal emphasis on individual choice and migration. In the humanitarian aspect, a number of factors make a community or group different from any other. These include culture, ethnicity, geographical area, language, lifestyle, race, religion, sexual orientation and socioeconomic status. A society is made up of diverse elements with particular features that make it unique. Every society is known by its predominant culture.

Journal Information

World Affairs is a leading journal, printed and published in India. It seeks to provide the much needed Asian and the developing world's perspective on issues of global significance. It stimulates interaction and debate between developed and scholars and decision makers in all countries. The journal addresses a wide range of readers and reaches out to world leaders, politicians, industrialists, academics, students, and the general public while focusing on the changing socio-politico-economic situation and equations in the world today, taking into account historical factors as well as futurological projection.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues © 2019 Kapur Surya Foundation
Request Permissions

This article is about the concept of cultural pluralism. For other uses of the term, see Pluralism (disambiguation).

Cultural pluralism is a term used when smaller groups within a larger society maintain their unique cultural identities, whereby their values and practices are accepted by the dominant culture, provided such are consistent with the laws and values of the wider society. As a sociological term, the definition and description of cultural pluralism has evolved. It has been described as not only a fact but a societal goal.[1]

Pluralist culture[edit]

In a pluralist culture, groups not only co-exist side by side but also consider qualities of other groups as traits worth having in the dominant culture. Pluralistic societies place strong expectations of integration on members, rather than expectations of assimilation. The existence of such institutions and practices is possible if the cultural communities are accepted by the larger society in a pluralist culture and sometimes require the protection of the law. Often, the acceptance of a culture may require that the new or minority culture remove some aspects of their culture which is incompatible with the laws or values of the dominant culture. Some pluralists such as Hamed Kazemzadeh argues that the concept of pluralist culture has been prevalent since ancient times. Even the Achaemenid Empire, which was founded by Cyrus the Great, successfully followed a policy of incorporating and tolerating various cultures.[2]

Distinction from multiculturalism[edit]

Cultural pluralism is distinct from multiculturalism, which lacks the requirement of a dominant culture. If the dominant culture is weakened, societies can easily pass from cultural pluralism into multiculturalism without any intentional steps being taken by that society. If communities function separately from each other, or compete with one another, they are not considered culturally pluralistic.[3]

In 1971, the Canadian government referred to cultural pluralism, as opposed to multiculturalism, as the "very essence" of the nation's identity.[4] Cultural pluralism can be practiced at varying degrees by a group or an individual.[5] A prominent example of pluralism is 20th-century United States, in which a dominant culture with strong elements of nationalism, a sporting culture, and an artistic culture contained also smaller groups with their own ethnic, religious, and cultural norms.[citation needed]

History[edit]

The notion of cultural pluralism in the United States has its roots in the transcendentalist movement, and was developed by pragmatist philosophers such as Horace Kallen, William James, and John Dewey. Randolph Bourne, a later theorist, provided one of the most famous articulations of cultural pluralism through his 1916 essay, "Trans-National America".[citation needed]

Kallen is widely credited as being the originator of the concept of cultural pluralism.[6][7][8] His 1915 essay in The Nation, titled "Democracy versus the Melting Pot", was written as an argument against the concept of the 'Americanization' of European immigrants.[9] He coined the term cultural pluralism, itself, in 1924 through his Culture and Democracy in the United States.[10]

In 1976, the concept was further explored by Merwin Crawford Young in The Politics of Cultural Pluralism. Young's work, in African studies, emphasizes the flexibility of the definition of cultural pluralism within a society.[11] More recent advocates include moral and cultural anthropologist Richard Shweder.

A 1976 article in the Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare offered a redefinition of cultural pluralism, described as a social condition in which communities of different cultures live together and function in an open system.[3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Hazard, William R.; Stent, Madelon (1973). "Cultural Pluralism and Schooling: Some Preliminary Observations". Cultural Pluralism in Education: A Mandate for Change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. p. 13.
  2. ^ Kazemzadeh, Hamed (January 2018). "Hamed Kazemzadeh: Pluralism in Ideological Peacebuilding". Internal Journal of Acpcs.
  3. ^ a b Pantoja, Antonia, Wilhelmina Perry, and Barbara Blourock. 1976. "Towards the Development of Theory: Cultural Pluralism Redefined." The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 4(1):11. ISSN 0191-5096.
  4. ^ House of Commons. 8 October 1971. Debates, 28th Parliament, 3rd Session, Volume 8. Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada. via "Canadian Multicultural Policy 1971." Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21.
  5. ^ Haug, Marie R. 1967. "Social and Cultural Pluralism as a Concept in Social System Analysis." American Journal of Sociology 73(3):294–304. JSTOR 2776029.
  6. ^ Toll, William. 1997. "Horace M. Kallen: Pluralism and American Jewish Identity." American Jewish History 85(1):57–74. doi:10.1353/ajh.1997.0007. Project MUSE 422. Excerpt.
  7. ^ Konvitz, Milton Ridvas, ed. 1987. The Legacy of Horace M. Kallen. Associated University Presses. ISBN 0-8386-3291-2.
  8. ^ Sanday, Peggy R. 1976. Anthropology and the Public Interest. New York: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-617650-7.
  9. ^ Kallen, Horace. 18–25 February 1915. "Democracy Versus the Melting Pot." The Nation 100(2590):190–94, 217–20.
  10. ^ Kallen, Horace. 1924. Culture and Democracy in the United States. New York: Boni & Liveright. pp. 126–29.
  11. ^ Young, Merwin Crawford. 1976. The Politics of Cultural Pluralism. University of Wisconsin Press.

Further reading[edit]

  • John D. Inazu (2016). Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226365459.

Who suggested individual characteristics can be divided into primary and secondary dimensions?

Psychologist Gordon Allport was one of the first to categorize these characteristics: He created a list of more than 4,000 personality traits. Allport grouped these traits into three different categories: cardinal traits, central traits, and secondary traits.

Are defined as a set of activities which are repeated in certain situations with specific meaning?

Rituals. set of activities which are repeated in certain situations with specific meaning. Values.

Which of the following personal characteristics can be categorized as a secondary dimension of diversity in reference to culture?

secondary dimensions, including language, income, marital status, parental status, hobbies, interests, geography, values, religion, and military experience, are characteristics that individuals can change. All of these dimensions are important in public relations, but not all dimensions constitute a culture. 3.

Which of the following is defined as all the ways in which people differ?

Diversity includes all the ways in which people differ, encompassing the different characteristics that make one individual or group different from another.

zusammenhängende Posts

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte